The Contracts for Difference (Allocation) Regulations 2014
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
20 Reviews of non-qualification determinations
(1) An applicant may give a notice (“a review notice”) to the delivery body to request a review of a non-qualification determination (“a non-qualification review”). (1A) An applicant may not request a non-qualification review of a determination that an application is not a qualifying application by virtue of the applicant not being able to provide a sustainable industry reward statement, as required by regulation 27B(2). (2) A review notice must— (a) subject to paragraph (6)(a), be given by a date (“the non-qualification review request date”) which is no later than 5 working days after the date of the notice containing the non-qualification determination; (b) contain the matters specified in paragraph (3) and be made in the form and manner as may be required by the delivery body; and (c) subject to paragraph (6)(b), not contain any documentary evidence which was not provided to the delivery body in support of the application which is the subject of the non-qualification determination. (3) The matters referred to in paragraph (2)(b) are— (a) a concise statement which— (i) identifies the relevant part of the non-qualification determination in dispute; and (ii) sets out the facts on which the applicant relies; (b) a summary of the grounds for disputing the non-qualification determination; (c) a succinct presentation of the arguments supporting each of the grounds for dispute; and (d) a schedule listing the documents submitted with the review notice. (4) Where the delivery body receives a review notice in accordance with paragraph (2), it must give a notice (“a non-qualification review notice”) to the applicant which— (a) states whether or not the delivery body has determined to uphold the non-qualification determination; and (b) gives reasons for the determination. (5) Subject to paragraph (6)(a), a non-qualification review notice must be given by no later than 10 working days after the date on which the review notice is received. (6) The contract allocation framework which applies to the allocation round may— (a) provide for a different period than that stated in paragraph (2)(a) or (5), and where such a different period is provided for, the obligation in paragraph (2)(a) or (5) applies in respect of that different period ; and (b) permit a review notice to contain documentary evidence or information of a description specified in the contract allocation framework.
20 Reviews of non-qualification determinations
(1) An applicant may give a notice (“a review notice”) to the delivery body to request a review of a non-qualification determination (“a non-qualification review”). (1A) An applicant may not request a non-qualification review of a determination that an application is not a qualifying application by virtue of the applicant not being able to provide a sustainable industry reward statement, as required by regulation 27B(2). (2) A review notice must— (a) subject to paragraph (6)(a), be given by a date (“the non-qualification review request date”) which is no later than 5 working days after the date of the notice containing the non-qualification determination; (b) contain the matters specified in paragraph (3) and be made in the form and manner as may be required by the delivery body; and (c) subject to paragraph (6)(b), not contain any documentary evidence which was not provided to the delivery body in support of the application which is the subject of the non-qualification determination. (3) The matters referred to in paragraph (2)(b) are— (a) a concise statement which— (i) identifies the relevant part of the non-qualification determination in dispute; and (ii) sets out the facts on which the applicant relies; (b) a summary of the grounds for disputing the non-qualification determination; (c) a succinct presentation of the arguments supporting each of the grounds for dispute; and (d) a schedule listing the documents submitted with the review notice. (4) Where the delivery body receives a review notice in accordance with paragraph (2), it must give a notice (“a non-qualification review notice”) to the applicant which— (a) states whether or not the delivery body has determined to uphold the non-qualification determination; and (b) gives reasons for the determination. (5) Subject to paragraph (6)(a), a non-qualification review notice must be given by no later than 10 working days after the date on which the review notice is received. (6) The contract allocation framework which applies to the allocation round may— (a) provide for a different period than that stated in paragraph (2)(a) or (5), and where such a different period is provided for, the obligation in paragraph (2)(a) or (5) applies in respect of that different period ; and (b) permit a review notice to contain documentary evidence or information of a description specified in the contract allocation framework.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.