Industrial Assurance Act 1923 (repealed )
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
17 Inspection.
(1) If in the opinion of the Commission there is reasonable cause to believe that an offence against this Act or against the Insurance Companies Act 1982 has been or is likely to be committed by an industrial assurance company, the Commission or any inspector appointed by it for the purpose shall have power to examine into and report on the affairs of the company, and for that purpose may exercise in respect of the company all or any of the powers given by Part V of the Friendly Societies Act 1992 to a person appointed by the Commission to investigate a friendly society. (2) When it receives the report of a person appointed under subsection (1) above, the Commission may issue such directions and take such steps as it considers necessary or proper to deal with the situation disclosed by the report and in particular may present a petition to the court for the winding up of the company. (3) The Commission may, if it considers it just, direct that all or any of the expenses of and incidental or preliminary to an inspection under this section shall be defrayed out of the funds of the. . . company, or by the officers or former officers,. . . or board of directors of the. . . company, or any of them in such proportions as the Commission directs and sums directed by it to be so paid shall be recoverable by it summarily as a civil debt: Provided that any. . . company or person directed to pay any part of such expenses may, with the leave of the court, appeal against the direction to the High Court, or in the case of a. . . company registered in Scotland to the Court of Session. (4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
17 Inspection.
(1) If in the opinion of the Commission there is reasonable cause to believe that an offence against this Act or against the Insurance Companies Act 1982 has been or is likely to be committed by an industrial assurance company, the Commission or any inspector appointed by it for the purpose shall have power to examine into and report on the affairs of the company, and for that purpose may exercise in respect of the company all or any of the powers given by Part V of the Friendly Societies Act 1992 to a person appointed by the Commission to investigate a friendly society. (2) When it receives the report of a person appointed under subsection (1) above, the Commission may issue such directions and take such steps as it considers necessary or proper to deal with the situation disclosed by the report and in particular may present a petition to the court for the winding up of the company. (3) The Commission may, if it considers it just, direct that all or any of the expenses of and incidental or preliminary to an inspection under this section shall be defrayed out of the funds of the. . . company, or by the officers or former officers,. . . or board of directors of the. . . company, or any of them in such proportions as the Commission directs and sums directed by it to be so paid shall be recoverable by it summarily as a civil debt: Provided that any. . . company or person directed to pay any part of such expenses may, with the leave of the court, appeal against the direction to the High Court, or in the case of a. . . company registered in Scotland to the Court of Session. (4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.