The Armed Forces (Court Martial) (Amendment) Rules 2024
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
11 Amendment of rule 32 (persons ineligible for membership in particular circumstances)
In rule 32 (persons ineligible for membership in particular circumstances)— (a) after paragraph (4) insert— (4A) A person is ineligible for membership of the court for any review of sentence proceedings if, at any time since the date of the commission of any offence for which the sentence that falls to be reviewed was imposed, that person and the offender were serving in the same unit. ; (b) after paragraph (8), insert— (8A) A person is not ineligible for membership of the court for review of sentence proceedings by virtue of having been a member of the court for— (a) any trial or appellate proceedings in which the offender was convicted of any offence for which the sentence that falls to be reviewed was imposed; (b) any proceedings in which the sentence that falls to be reviewed was imposed or varied. .
11 Amendment of rule 32 (persons ineligible for membership in particular circumstances)
In rule 32 (persons ineligible for membership in particular circumstances)— (a) after paragraph (4) insert— (4A) A person is ineligible for membership of the court for any review of sentence proceedings if, at any time since the date of the commission of any offence for which the sentence that falls to be reviewed was imposed, that person and the offender were serving in the same unit. ; (b) after paragraph (8), insert— (8A) A person is not ineligible for membership of the court for review of sentence proceedings by virtue of having been a member of the court for— (a) any trial or appellate proceedings in which the offender was convicted of any offence for which the sentence that falls to be reviewed was imposed; (b) any proceedings in which the sentence that falls to be reviewed was imposed or varied. .
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.