Propose a change

Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Act 2025

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

102 Penalty as alternative to prosecution: extension to non-benefit payments

(1) Section 115A of the Social Security Administration Act 1992 (penalty as alternative to prosecution) is amended in accordance with subsections (2) to (6). (2) After subsection (1A) insert— (1B) This section also applies where— (a) an overpayment notice has been given to a person (“P”) under section 71ZJ (overpayment notice in relation to non-benefit payment), and (b) in relation to the overpayment notice, the condition in subsection (1C) is met. (1C) The condition in this subsection is met where— (a) the time for P to seek a review of the overpayment notice under section 71ZK has passed without P seeking a review, or (b) if P sought a review of the notice within the time allowed, the review has taken place, and— (i) the period mentioned in section 71ZK(6)(a) for P to appeal against the outcome of the review has passed without P bringing an appeal, or (ii) P’s appeal (including any onward appeal) against the outcome of the review has been withdrawn, abandoned or finally determined. (3) In subsection (2)(a), after “above” insert “, or in relation to the overpayment notice referred to in subsection (1B),”. (4) In subsection (3), after “(1)” insert “or (1B)”. (5) In subsection (8), in the words before paragraph (a), after “section” insert “, except in relation to a case referred to in subsection (1B),”. (6) After subsection (8) insert— (8A) In relation to a case referred to in subsection (1B), “overpayment” has the meaning given in section 71ZI(1). (7) In section 115B of the Social Security Administration Act 1992 (penalty as alternative to prosecution: colluding employers etc), in subsection (2)(b), after “benefit offence” insert “or an offence in relation to an overpayment of a non-benefit payment”.

Your change, as a redline

102 Penalty as alternative to prosecution: extension to non-benefit payments

(1) Section 115A of the Social Security Administration Act 1992 (penalty as alternative to prosecution) is amended in accordance with subsections (2) to (6). (2) After subsection (1A) insert— (1B) This section also applies where— (a) an overpayment notice has been given to a person (“P”) under section 71ZJ (overpayment notice in relation to non-benefit payment), and (b) in relation to the overpayment notice, the condition in subsection (1C) is met. (1C) The condition in this subsection is met where— (a) the time for P to seek a review of the overpayment notice under section 71ZK has passed without P seeking a review, or (b) if P sought a review of the notice within the time allowed, the review has taken place, and— (i) the period mentioned in section 71ZK(6)(a) for P to appeal against the outcome of the review has passed without P bringing an appeal, or (ii) P’s appeal (including any onward appeal) against the outcome of the review has been withdrawn, abandoned or finally determined. (3) In subsection (2)(a), after “above” insert “, or in relation to the overpayment notice referred to in subsection (1B),”. (4) In subsection (3), after “(1)” insert “or (1B)”. (5) In subsection (8), in the words before paragraph (a), after “section” insert “, except in relation to a case referred to in subsection (1B),”. (6) After subsection (8) insert— (8A) In relation to a case referred to in subsection (1B), “overpayment” has the meaning given in section 71ZI(1). (7) In section 115B of the Social Security Administration Act 1992 (penalty as alternative to prosecution: colluding employers etc), in subsection (2)(b), after “benefit offence” insert “or an offence in relation to an overpayment of a non-benefit payment”.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds