The Nuclear Safeguards (EU Exit and Fees) (Amendment) Regulations 2026
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
6 Amendment to regulation 5
In regulation 5 (particular safeguard provisions)— (a) in paragraph (1)— (i) in the words before sub-paragraph (a), for the words from “basic technical characteristics” to “relevant technical characteristics” substitute “information submitted by an operator under Parts 2, 3 or 6 or regulation 31 of these Regulations and having discussed the relevant information”; (ii) for sub-paragraph (b) substitute— (b) take account of any— (i) obligations under a relevant international agreement; and (ii) relevant operational and technical constraints on the operator and the qualifying nuclear facility. ; (b) in paragraph (4)— (i) in sub-paragraph (b), for “basic technical characteristics” substitute “design information”; (ii) after sub-paragraph (h) insert— (i) any other procedure, arrangement or equipment the ONR considers necessary or appropriate to give effect to an obligation under a relevant international agreement. ; (c) after paragraph (4) insert— (5) Having reviewed the information submitted by an operator under Parts 2, 3 or 6 or regulation 31 of these Regulations and having discussed the relevant information with the operator, the ONR may amend any particular safeguard provision imposed under paragraph (1) provided the amended provision meets the requirements of sub-paragraphs (a) and (b) of that paragraph. (6) Paragraphs (2) and (3) apply in relation to an amended particular safeguard provision. (7) The ONR may, by written notice to the relevant operator, withdraw any particular safeguard provision imposed under paragraph (1) where the ONR considers it is no longer necessary or appropriate. .
6 Amendment to regulation 5
In regulation 5 (particular safeguard provisions)— (a) in paragraph (1)— (i) in the words before sub-paragraph (a), for the words from “basic technical characteristics” to “relevant technical characteristics” substitute “information submitted by an operator under Parts 2, 3 or 6 or regulation 31 of these Regulations and having discussed the relevant information”; (ii) for sub-paragraph (b) substitute— (b) take account of any— (i) obligations under a relevant international agreement; and (ii) relevant operational and technical constraints on the operator and the qualifying nuclear facility. ; (b) in paragraph (4)— (i) in sub-paragraph (b), for “basic technical characteristics” substitute “design information”; (ii) after sub-paragraph (h) insert— (i) any other procedure, arrangement or equipment the ONR considers necessary or appropriate to give effect to an obligation under a relevant international agreement. ; (c) after paragraph (4) insert— (5) Having reviewed the information submitted by an operator under Parts 2, 3 or 6 or regulation 31 of these Regulations and having discussed the relevant information with the operator, the ONR may amend any particular safeguard provision imposed under paragraph (1) provided the amended provision meets the requirements of sub-paragraphs (a) and (b) of that paragraph. (6) Paragraphs (2) and (3) apply in relation to an amended particular safeguard provision. (7) The ONR may, by written notice to the relevant operator, withdraw any particular safeguard provision imposed under paragraph (1) where the ONR considers it is no longer necessary or appropriate. .
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.