Land Compensation (Scotland) Act 1963
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
29 Proceedings for challenging validity of decision on appeal under s. 26.
(1) If any person aggrieved by a decision of the Secretary of State under section 26 of this Act or the local planning authority desires to question the validity of that decision on the ground that it is not within the powers of this Act or that any of the requirements of this Act or of a development order or of the Tribunals and Inquiries Act 1971 or rules made thereunder have not been complied with in relation to it, that person or authority may, within six weeks from the date of the decision, make an application to the Court of Session, and the Court of Session— (a) may by interim order suspend the operation of the decision until the determination of the proceedings; (b) if satisfied that the decision is not within the powers of this Act or that the interests of the applicant have been substantially prejudiced by a failure to comply with the said requirements, may quash the decision. (2) Subject to subsection (1) of this section, the validity of a decision on an appeal under section 26 of this Act shall not be questioned in any legal proceedings whatsoever. (3) Nothing in this section shall affect the exercise of any jurisdiction of any court in respect of any refusal or failure on the part of the Secretary of State to give a decision on an appeal under section 26 of this Act.
29 Proceedings for challenging validity of decision on appeal under s. 26.
(1) If any person aggrieved by a decision of the Secretary of State under section 26 of this Act or the local planning authority desires to question the validity of that decision on the ground that it is not within the powers of this Act or that any of the requirements of this Act or of a development order or of the Tribunals and Inquiries Act 1971 or rules made thereunder have not been complied with in relation to it, that person or authority may, within six weeks from the date of the decision, make an application to the Court of Session, and the Court of Session— (a) may by interim order suspend the operation of the decision until the determination of the proceedings; (b) if satisfied that the decision is not within the powers of this Act or that the interests of the applicant have been substantially prejudiced by a failure to comply with the said requirements, may quash the decision. (2) Subject to subsection (1) of this section, the validity of a decision on an appeal under section 26 of this Act shall not be questioned in any legal proceedings whatsoever. (3) Nothing in this section shall affect the exercise of any jurisdiction of any court in respect of any refusal or failure on the part of the Secretary of State to give a decision on an appeal under section 26 of this Act.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.