Justices of the Peace Act 1979 (repealed 19.6.1997)
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
24D Appointment of justices’ chief executive.
(1) Every magistrates’ courts committee shall appoint a justices’ chief executive. (2) A person may not be appointed as justices’ chief executive unless— (a) the magistrates’ courts committee have submitted to the Lord Chancellor, in accordance with regulations, an application for approval of one or more persons offering themselves for the appointment, (b) the Lord Chancellor has approved one or more of those persons, and (c) the person appointed is a person so approved. (3) For the purposes of subsection (2) above, appointment as justices’ chief executive does not include, in relation to a person employed as such under a contract for a fixed term, re-appointment on the expiry of that term. (4) Where the Lord Chancellor declines to approve any person who is named in an application under subsection (2)(a) above, he shall inform the magistrates’ courts committee of the reasons for his decision. (5) A person may not be appointed as justices’ chief executive unless he is eligible under section 26 of this Act for appointment as justices’ clerk. (6) A person may not be appointed both as justices’ chief executive and as justices’ clerk for a petty sessions area unless the Lord Chancellor has agreed that he may hold both appointments. (7) Where, in accordance with subsection (6) above, a person holds an appointment as justices’ chief executive with an appointment as justices’ clerk for a petty sessions area, he shall not exercise any functions as justices’ clerk for the petty sessions area unless authorised to do so (either generally or in any particular case) by the magistrates’ courts committee for the area which includes that petty sessions area. (8) In this section “regulations” means regulations made by the Lord Chancellor by statutory instrument.
24D Appointment of justices’ chief executive.
(1) Every magistrates’ courts committee shall appoint a justices’ chief executive. (2) A person may not be appointed as justices’ chief executive unless— (a) the magistrates’ courts committee have submitted to the Lord Chancellor, in accordance with regulations, an application for approval of one or more persons offering themselves for the appointment, (b) the Lord Chancellor has approved one or more of those persons, and (c) the person appointed is a person so approved. (3) For the purposes of subsection (2) above, appointment as justices’ chief executive does not include, in relation to a person employed as such under a contract for a fixed term, re-appointment on the expiry of that term. (4) Where the Lord Chancellor declines to approve any person who is named in an application under subsection (2)(a) above, he shall inform the magistrates’ courts committee of the reasons for his decision. (5) A person may not be appointed as justices’ chief executive unless he is eligible under section 26 of this Act for appointment as justices’ clerk. (6) A person may not be appointed both as justices’ chief executive and as justices’ clerk for a petty sessions area unless the Lord Chancellor has agreed that he may hold both appointments. (7) Where, in accordance with subsection (6) above, a person holds an appointment as justices’ chief executive with an appointment as justices’ clerk for a petty sessions area, he shall not exercise any functions as justices’ clerk for the petty sessions area unless authorised to do so (either generally or in any particular case) by the magistrates’ courts committee for the area which includes that petty sessions area. (8) In this section “regulations” means regulations made by the Lord Chancellor by statutory instrument.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.