Marriage Act 1949
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
28A Power to require evidence of consent to marriages of same sex couples
(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1A) In the case of an intended marriage to which section 27D applies, the superintendent registrar to whom the notice of the marriage is given may require the relevant governing authority to produce evidence relating to the consent mentioned in section 26B(2)(b), (4)(b) or (6)(d). (2) A requirement under subsection (1A) may be imposed at any time— (a) on or after the giving of the notice of marriage; but (b) before a marriage schedule is issued. (3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
28A Power to require evidence of consent to marriages of same sex couples
(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1A) In the case of an intended marriage to which section 27D applies, the superintendent registrar to whom the notice of the marriage is given may require the relevant governing authority to produce evidence relating to the consent mentioned in section 26B(2)(b), (4)(b) or (6)(d). (2) A requirement under subsection (1A) may be imposed at any time— (a) on or after the giving of the notice of marriage; but (b) before a marriage schedule is issued. (3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.