The Public Service Pension Schemes (Rectification of Unlawful Discrimination) (Tax) (No. 2) Regulations 2023
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
16 Lifetime allowance excess lump sum: lump sum already paid
(1) Paragraphs (2) to (5) apply where— (a) an individual has been paid a lump sum that, disregarding the operation of the relevant rectification provisions, is a lifetime allowance excess lump sum, and (b) as a result of the operation of a relevant rectification provision, the condition in paragraph 11(a) of Schedule 29 to FA 2004 (unavailability of lifetime allowance) has ceased to be met in relation to all or part of the lump sum (“the excess amount”). (2) The excess amount— (a) is to be treated as falling, and is to be treated as always having fallen, within section 164(1) of FA 2004 (authorised member payments), and (b) is to be treated as being, and is to be treated as always having been, a lifetime allowance excess lump sum for the purposes of Part 9 of ITEPA 2003. (3) The individual becoming entitled to the excess amount is to be treated as a benefit crystallisation event in relation to that individual. (4) The amount crystallised for the purposes of that benefit crystallisation event is the amount of the excess amount. (5) No liability to income tax arises in respect of 25% of the excess amount. (6) In respect of 75% of the excess amount— (a) the second lifetime allowance charge condition in section 214(3) of FA 2004 (lifetime allowance charge) is to be treated as met, (b) that amount is to be treated as the basic amount for the purposes of section 215(3)(a) of FA 2004 (amount of charge), and (c) the lifetime allowance charge which arises is to be charged at the rate of 40%.
16 Lifetime allowance excess lump sum: lump sum already paid
(1) Paragraphs (2) to (5) apply where— (a) an individual has been paid a lump sum that, disregarding the operation of the relevant rectification provisions, is a lifetime allowance excess lump sum, and (b) as a result of the operation of a relevant rectification provision, the condition in paragraph 11(a) of Schedule 29 to FA 2004 (unavailability of lifetime allowance) has ceased to be met in relation to all or part of the lump sum (“the excess amount”). (2) The excess amount— (a) is to be treated as falling, and is to be treated as always having fallen, within section 164(1) of FA 2004 (authorised member payments), and (b) is to be treated as being, and is to be treated as always having been, a lifetime allowance excess lump sum for the purposes of Part 9 of ITEPA 2003. (3) The individual becoming entitled to the excess amount is to be treated as a benefit crystallisation event in relation to that individual. (4) The amount crystallised for the purposes of that benefit crystallisation event is the amount of the excess amount. (5) No liability to income tax arises in respect of 25% of the excess amount. (6) In respect of 75% of the excess amount— (a) the second lifetime allowance charge condition in section 214(3) of FA 2004 (lifetime allowance charge) is to be treated as met, (b) that amount is to be treated as the basic amount for the purposes of section 215(3)(a) of FA 2004 (amount of charge), and (c) the lifetime allowance charge which arises is to be charged at the rate of 40%.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.