Council Directive 91/671/EEC of 16 December 1991 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to compulsory use of safety belts in vehicles of less than 3,5 tonnes
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
Article 1
1. This Directive shall apply to all motor vehicles in categories M1, M2, M3, N1, N2 and N3 as defined in Annex II to Directive 70/156/EEC ( 8 ), intended for use on the road, having at least four wheels and a maximum design speed exceeding 25 km/h. 2. For the purposes of this Directive: — the definitions of safety systems, including safety belts and child restraints, with regard to vehicles in categories M1 and N1, and of the components thereof shall be those appearing in Annex I to Directive 77/541/EEC ( 9 ), — ‘rearward-facing’ shall mean facing in the direction opposite to the normal direction of travel of the vehicle. 3. Child restraints shall be classified in five ‘mass groups’: (a) group 0 for children of a mass of less than 10 kg; (b) group 0+ for children of a mass of less than 13 kg; (c) group I for children of a mass of from 9 kg to 18 kg; (d) group II for children of a mass of from 15 kg to 25 kg; (e) group III for children of a mass of from 22 kg to 36 kg. 4. Child restraints shall be subdivided into two classes: (a) an integral class comprising a combination of straps or flexible components with a securing buckle, adjusting device, attachments and in some cases a supplementary chair and/or impact shield, capable of being anchored by means of its own integral strap or straps; (b) a non-integral class that may comprise a partial restraint which, when used in conjunction with an adult belt which passes around the body of the child or restrains the device in which the child is placed, forms a complete child-restraint system.
Article 1
1. This Directive shall apply to all motor vehicles in categories M1, M2, M3, N1, N2 and N3 as defined in Annex II to Directive 70/156/EEC ( 8 ), intended for use on the road, having at least four wheels and a maximum design speed exceeding 25 km/h. 2. For the purposes of this Directive: — the definitions of safety systems, including safety belts and child restraints, with regard to vehicles in categories M1 and N1, and of the components thereof shall be those appearing in Annex I to Directive 77/541/EEC ( 9 ), — ‘rearward-facing’ shall mean facing in the direction opposite to the normal direction of travel of the vehicle. 3. Child restraints shall be classified in five ‘mass groups’: (a) group 0 for children of a mass of less than 10 kg; (b) group 0+ for children of a mass of less than 13 kg; (c) group I for children of a mass of from 9 kg to 18 kg; (d) group II for children of a mass of from 15 kg to 25 kg; (e) group III for children of a mass of from 22 kg to 36 kg. 4. Child restraints shall be subdivided into two classes: (a) an integral class comprising a combination of straps or flexible components with a securing buckle, adjusting device, attachments and in some cases a supplementary chair and/or impact shield, capable of being anchored by means of its own integral strap or straps; (b) a non-integral class that may comprise a partial restraint which, when used in conjunction with an adult belt which passes around the body of the child or restrains the device in which the child is placed, forms a complete child-restraint system.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.