Propose a change

Marine and Coastal Access Act 2009

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

141 Exceptions to offences under section 139 or 140

(1) A person is not guilty of an offence under section 139 or 140 if the act which is alleged to constitute the offence— (a) was done in accordance with section 125(2) by a public authority; (aa) was done by a public authority exercising functions under or by virtue of Part 3 of the Planning and Infrastructure Act 2025 (development and nature recovery); (b) was expressly authorised by an authorisation granted in accordance with section 126, or was necessarily incidental to such an act; (c) was done in accordance with— (i) a permit issued under section 129(5) 129C(3), 134(4), 134C(3), 137A(6) or 137E(6), or (ii) a permit issued by the appropriate authority; (d) was necessary in the interests of national security or the prevention or detection of crime, or was necessary for securing public health; (e) was necessary for the purpose of securing the safety of any vessel, aircraft or marine installation; (f) was done for the purpose of saving life. (2) Subsection (1)(e) does not apply where the necessity was due to the fault of the person or of some other person acting under the person's direction or control. (3) A person is not guilty of an offence under section 139 by reason of doing anything that is an offence under section 140. (4) It is a defence for a person who is charged with an offence under section 140 to show that— (a) the act which is alleged to constitute the offence was— (i) an act done for the purpose of, and in the course of, sea fishing, or (ii) an act done in connection with such an act, and (b) the effect of the act on the protected feature in question could not reasonably have been avoided. (5) The Secretary of State may by order amend this section so as to remove, or restrict the application of, the defence provided by subsection (4). (6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (7) In this section— “act” includes omission; ...

Your change, as a redline

141 Exceptions to offences under section 139 or 140

(1) A person is not guilty of an offence under section 139 or 140 if the act which is alleged to constitute the offence— (a) was done in accordance with section 125(2) by a public authority; (aa) was done by a public authority exercising functions under or by virtue of Part 3 of the Planning and Infrastructure Act 2025 (development and nature recovery); (b) was expressly authorised by an authorisation granted in accordance with section 126, or was necessarily incidental to such an act; (c) was done in accordance with— (i) a permit issued under section 129(5) 129C(3), 134(4), 134C(3), 137A(6) or 137E(6), or (ii) a permit issued by the appropriate authority; (d) was necessary in the interests of national security or the prevention or detection of crime, or was necessary for securing public health; (e) was necessary for the purpose of securing the safety of any vessel, aircraft or marine installation; (f) was done for the purpose of saving life. (2) Subsection (1)(e) does not apply where the necessity was due to the fault of the person or of some other person acting under the person's direction or control. (3) A person is not guilty of an offence under section 139 by reason of doing anything that is an offence under section 140. (4) It is a defence for a person who is charged with an offence under section 140 to show that— (a) the act which is alleged to constitute the offence was— (i) an act done for the purpose of, and in the course of, sea fishing, or (ii) an act done in connection with such an act, and (b) the effect of the act on the protected feature in question could not reasonably have been avoided. (5) The Secretary of State may by order amend this section so as to remove, or restrict the application of, the defence provided by subsection (4). (6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (7) In this section— “act” includes omission; ...

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds