Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
SCHEDULE 2 Minor and consequential amendments
Section 26 Coroners Act 1988 (c. 13) 1 (1) The Coroners Act 1988 is amended as follows. (2) In the following provisions, after “manslaughter” there is inserted “ , corporate manslaughter ” (a) section 11(6) (no finding of guilt at coroner's inquest) (twice); (b) subsection (1)(a)(i) of section 16 (adjournment of inquest in event of criminal proceedings); (c) subsections (1)(a) and (2)(a) of section 17 (coroner to be informed of result of criminal proceedings). (3) In section 35(1) (interpretation), after the definition of “Greater London” there is inserted— “person”, in relation to an offence of corporate manslaughter, includes organisation; . Criminal Justice Act 2003 (c. 44) 2 In Schedule 4 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003 (qualifying offences for purposes of section 62), after paragraph 4 there is inserted— Corporate manslaughter 4A An offence under section 1 of the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007. 3 (1) Schedule 5 to that Act (qualifying offences for purposes of Part 10) is amended as follows. (2) After paragraph 4 there is inserted— Corporate manslaughter 4A An offence under section 1 of the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007. (3) After paragraph 33 there is inserted— Corporate manslaughter 33A An offence under section 1 of the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007. Criminal Justice (Northern Ireland) Order 2004 (S.I. 2004/1500 (N.I. 9)) 4 In Schedule 2 to the Criminal Justice (Northern Ireland) Order 2004 (qualifying offences for purposes of Article 21), after paragraph 4 there is inserted— Corporate manslaughter 4A An offence under section 1 of the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007.
SCHEDULE 2 Minor and consequential amendments
Section 26 Coroners Act 1988 (c. 13) 1 (1) The Coroners Act 1988 is amended as follows. (2) In the following provisions, after “manslaughter” there is inserted “ , corporate manslaughter ” (a) section 11(6) (no finding of guilt at coroner's inquest) (twice); (b) subsection (1)(a)(i) of section 16 (adjournment of inquest in event of criminal proceedings); (c) subsections (1)(a) and (2)(a) of section 17 (coroner to be informed of result of criminal proceedings). (3) In section 35(1) (interpretation), after the definition of “Greater London” there is inserted— “person”, in relation to an offence of corporate manslaughter, includes organisation; . Criminal Justice Act 2003 (c. 44) 2 In Schedule 4 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003 (qualifying offences for purposes of section 62), after paragraph 4 there is inserted— Corporate manslaughter 4A An offence under section 1 of the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007. 3 (1) Schedule 5 to that Act (qualifying offences for purposes of Part 10) is amended as follows. (2) After paragraph 4 there is inserted— Corporate manslaughter 4A An offence under section 1 of the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007. (3) After paragraph 33 there is inserted— Corporate manslaughter 33A An offence under section 1 of the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007. Criminal Justice (Northern Ireland) Order 2004 (S.I. 2004/1500 (N.I. 9)) 4 In Schedule 2 to the Criminal Justice (Northern Ireland) Order 2004 (qualifying offences for purposes of Article 21), after paragraph 4 there is inserted— Corporate manslaughter 4A An offence under section 1 of the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.