Courts-Martial (Appeals) Act 1968
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
27 Right of appellant to be present.
(1) An appellant (whether or not in custody) is entitled to be present on the hearing of his appeal. (2) Subsection (1) does not apply to an appellant in custody— (a) where his appeal is on a ground involving only a question of law, (b) on an application by him for leave to appeal, or (c) on any proceedings preliminary or incidental to an appeal, unless the Appeal Court give him leave to be present.
27 Right of appellant to be present.
(1) An appellant (whether or not in custody) is entitled to be present on the hearing of his appeal. (2) Subsection (1) does not apply to an appellant in custody— (a) where his appeal is on a ground involving only a question of law, (b) on an application by him for leave to appeal, or (c) on any proceedings preliminary or incidental to an appeal, unless the Appeal Court give him leave to be present.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.