Supply of Goods (Implied Terms) Act 1973
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
11A Modification of remedies for breach of statutory condition in non-consumer cases.
(1) Where in the case of a relevant hire-purchase agreement— (a) the person to whom goods are bailed would, apart from this subsection, have the right to reject them by reason of a breach on the part of the creditor of a term implied by section 9, 10 or 11(1)(a) or (c) above, but (b) the breach is so slight that it would be unreasonable for him to reject them, ... the breach is not to be treated as a breach of condition but may be treated as a breach of warranty. (2) This section applies unless a contrary intention appears in, or is to be implied from, the agreement. (3) It is for the creditor to show— (a) that a breach fell within subsection (1)(b) above, and (b) that the agreement was a relevant hire-purchase agreement. (4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5) This section does not apply to Scotland.
11A Modification of remedies for breach of statutory condition in non-consumer cases.
(1) Where in the case of a relevant hire-purchase agreement— (a) the person to whom goods are bailed would, apart from this subsection, have the right to reject them by reason of a breach on the part of the creditor of a term implied by section 9, 10 or 11(1)(a) or (c) above, but (b) the breach is so slight that it would be unreasonable for him to reject them, ... the breach is not to be treated as a breach of condition but may be treated as a breach of warranty. (2) This section applies unless a contrary intention appears in, or is to be implied from, the agreement. (3) It is for the creditor to show— (a) that a breach fell within subsection (1)(b) above, and (b) that the agreement was a relevant hire-purchase agreement. (4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5) This section does not apply to Scotland.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.