Aviation Security Act 1982
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
24AQ Dispute resolution: powers
(1) This section applies where the Secretary of State has considered a dispute about security planning at an aerodrome. (2) Where the dispute is about the contents of an aerodrome security plan, the Secretary of State may— (a) make a declaration that a provision specified in the declaration is or is not to be included in the plan; (b) make a declaration varying the plan. (3) Where the dispute is about the implementation of a plan, the Secretary of State may do any or all of the following— (a) make a declaration as to how any provision of the plan is to be construed; (b) make a declaration as to how any provision of the plan is to be, or ought to have been, implemented; (c) make a declaration varying the plan. (4) In relation to any dispute, the Secretary of State may (whether or not the Secretary of State exercises any other power under this section) do either or both of the following— (a) determine that a relevant person must pay to any other relevant person (“B”) a specified sum, or a sum to be assessed in a specified manner, in respect of costs reasonably incurred by B in connection with any security measures taken by B in relation to the aerodrome; (b) make an order requiring a relevant person to pay costs. (5) Subsection (4)(a) does not apply in relation to security measures taken by the chief officer of police for the relevant police area. (6) In subsection (4)(b) “ costs ” means— (a) the legal or other costs incurred by the Secretary of State (including costs attributable to the work of officials of the Secretary of State), and (b) the legal or other costs incurred by any members of the security executive group or any of the relevant persons.
24AQ Dispute resolution: powers
(1) This section applies where the Secretary of State has considered a dispute about security planning at an aerodrome. (2) Where the dispute is about the contents of an aerodrome security plan, the Secretary of State may— (a) make a declaration that a provision specified in the declaration is or is not to be included in the plan; (b) make a declaration varying the plan. (3) Where the dispute is about the implementation of a plan, the Secretary of State may do any or all of the following— (a) make a declaration as to how any provision of the plan is to be construed; (b) make a declaration as to how any provision of the plan is to be, or ought to have been, implemented; (c) make a declaration varying the plan. (4) In relation to any dispute, the Secretary of State may (whether or not the Secretary of State exercises any other power under this section) do either or both of the following— (a) determine that a relevant person must pay to any other relevant person (“B”) a specified sum, or a sum to be assessed in a specified manner, in respect of costs reasonably incurred by B in connection with any security measures taken by B in relation to the aerodrome; (b) make an order requiring a relevant person to pay costs. (5) Subsection (4)(a) does not apply in relation to security measures taken by the chief officer of police for the relevant police area. (6) In subsection (4)(b) “ costs ” means— (a) the legal or other costs incurred by the Secretary of State (including costs attributable to the work of officials of the Secretary of State), and (b) the legal or other costs incurred by any members of the security executive group or any of the relevant persons.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.