Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
29A Power to refer disputes to Secretary of State
(1) A relevant person may refer a dispute about the policing of a relevant aerodrome to the Secretary of State.
(2) For the purposes of this section and sections 29B to 29D, there is a dispute about the policing of a relevant aerodrome if—
(a) there is a dispute between any of the relevant persons about the terms to be included in a police services agreement and, in consequence, there is, or there is likely to be, a breach of the requirement imposed by section 25B(1),
(b) there is a dispute between any of the relevant persons about whether or how a police services agreement should be varied,
(c) there is a dispute between any of the relevant persons about the construction or operation of a police services agreement which is or has been in force in relation to the aerodrome, or
(d) there is a dispute between any of the relevant persons about the payments to be made, or the accommodation and facilities to be provided, under section 26(2C).
(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(c) or (d), it does not matter whether the aerodrome is a relevant aerodrome when the dispute arises.
Your change, as a redline
29A Power to refer disputes to Secretary of State
(1) A relevant person may refer a dispute about the policing of a relevant aerodrome to the Secretary of State.
(2) For the purposes of this section and sections 29B to 29D, there is a dispute about the policing of a relevant aerodrome if—
(a) there is a dispute between any of the relevant persons about the terms to be included in a police services agreement and, in consequence, there is, or there is likely to be, a breach of the requirement imposed by section 25B(1),
(b) there is a dispute between any of the relevant persons about whether or how a police services agreement should be varied,
(c) there is a dispute between any of the relevant persons about the construction or operation of a police services agreement which is or has been in force in relation to the aerodrome, or
(d) there is a dispute between any of the relevant persons about the payments to be made, or the accommodation and facilities to be provided, under section 26(2C).
(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(c) or (d), it does not matter whether the aerodrome is a relevant aerodrome when the dispute arises.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.