Propose a change

Family Law Act 1986

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

14 Power of court to refuse application or sist proceedings.

(1) A court in Scotland which has jurisdiction to entertain an application for a Part I order may refuse the application in any case where the matter in question has already been determined in other proceedings. (2) Where, at any stage of the proceedings on an application made to a court in Scotland for a Part I order, it appears to the court— (a) that proceedings with respect to the matters to which the application relates are continuing outside Scotland or in another court in Scotland; ... (b) that it would be more appropriate for those matters to be determined in proceedings outside Scotland or in another court in Scotland and that such proceedings are likely to be taken there, or (c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (d) that it should exercise its powers under Article 8 of the Hague Convention (request to authority in another Contracting State to assume jurisdiction), the court may sist the proceedings on that application or (as the case may be) exercise its powers under ... Article 8 of the Hague Convention .... (3) The court may recall a sist granted in order for it to exercise its powers under Article8 of the Hague Convention, and withdraw any request made by it to an authority in another Contracting State to assume jurisdiction, if— (a) the authority in the other Contracting State does not assume jurisdiction within the period for which the court granted the sist, or (b) the parties do not, within the period specified by the court, request the authority in the other Contracting State to assume jurisdiction.

Your change, as a redline

14 Power of court to refuse application or sist proceedings.

(1) A court in Scotland which has jurisdiction to entertain an application for a Part I order may refuse the application in any case where the matter in question has already been determined in other proceedings. (2) Where, at any stage of the proceedings on an application made to a court in Scotland for a Part I order, it appears to the court— (a) that proceedings with respect to the matters to which the application relates are continuing outside Scotland or in another court in Scotland; ... (b) that it would be more appropriate for those matters to be determined in proceedings outside Scotland or in another court in Scotland and that such proceedings are likely to be taken there, or (c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (d) that it should exercise its powers under Article 8 of the Hague Convention (request to authority in another Contracting State to assume jurisdiction), the court may sist the proceedings on that application or (as the case may be) exercise its powers under ... Article 8 of the Hague Convention .... (3) The court may recall a sist granted in order for it to exercise its powers under Article8 of the Hague Convention, and withdraw any request made by it to an authority in another Contracting State to assume jurisdiction, if— (a) the authority in the other Contracting State does not assume jurisdiction within the period for which the court granted the sist, or (b) the parties do not, within the period specified by the court, request the authority in the other Contracting State to assume jurisdiction.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds