Children and Social Work Act 2017
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
24 Child death reviews
After section 16L of the Children Act 2004 (inserted by section 23 of this Act) insert— Child death review partners for local authority areas Child death reviews 16M (1) The child death review partners for a local authority area in England must make arrangements for the review of each death of a child normally resident in the area. (2) The child death review partners may also, if they consider it appropriate, make arrangements for the review of a death in their area of a child not normally resident there. (3) The child death review partners must make arrangements for the analysis of information about deaths reviewed under this section. (4) The purposes of a review or analysis under this section are— (a) to identify any matters relating to the death or deaths that are relevant to the welfare of children in the area or to public health and safety, and (b) to consider whether it would be appropriate for anyone to take action in relation to any matters identified. (5) Where the child death review partners consider that it would be appropriate for a person to take action as mentioned in subsection (4)(b), they must inform that person. (6) The child death review partners for a local authority area in England must, at such intervals as they consider appropriate, prepare and publish a report on— (a) what they have done as a result of the arrangements under this section, and (b) how effective the arrangements have been in practice.
24 Child death reviews
After section 16L of the Children Act 2004 (inserted by section 23 of this Act) insert— Child death review partners for local authority areas Child death reviews 16M (1) The child death review partners for a local authority area in England must make arrangements for the review of each death of a child normally resident in the area. (2) The child death review partners may also, if they consider it appropriate, make arrangements for the review of a death in their area of a child not normally resident there. (3) The child death review partners must make arrangements for the analysis of information about deaths reviewed under this section. (4) The purposes of a review or analysis under this section are— (a) to identify any matters relating to the death or deaths that are relevant to the welfare of children in the area or to public health and safety, and (b) to consider whether it would be appropriate for anyone to take action in relation to any matters identified. (5) Where the child death review partners consider that it would be appropriate for a person to take action as mentioned in subsection (4)(b), they must inform that person. (6) The child death review partners for a local authority area in England must, at such intervals as they consider appropriate, prepare and publish a report on— (a) what they have done as a result of the arrangements under this section, and (b) how effective the arrangements have been in practice.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.