Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
17 Power to impose conditions on grant of listed building consent.
(1) Without prejudice to the generality of section 16(1), the conditions subject to which listed building consent may be granted may include conditions with respect to—
(a) the preservation of particular features of the building, either as part of it or after severance from it;
(b) the making good, after the works are completed, of any damage caused to the building by the works;
(c) the reconstruction of the building or any part of it following the execution of any works, with the use of original materials so far as practicable and with such alterations of the interior of the building as may be specified in the conditions.
(2) A condition may also be imposed requiring specified details of the works (whether or not set out in the application) to be approved subsequently by the local planning authority or, in the case of consent granted by the Secretary of State, specifying whether such details are to be approved by the local planning authority or by him.
(3) Listed building consent for the demolition of a listed building may be granted subject to a condition that the building shall not be demolished before—
(a) a contract for the carrying out of works of redevelopment of the site has been made; and
(b) planning permission has been granted for the redevelopment for which the contract provides.
(4) Regulations under this Act ... may, in relation to applications made pursuant to a condition attached to listed building consent, make any provision corresponding to provision that may be made in relation to applications for such consent under section 10(3).
Your change, as a redline
17 Power to impose conditions on grant of listed building consent.
(1) Without prejudice to the generality of section 16(1), the conditions subject to which listed building consent may be granted may include conditions with respect to—
(a) the preservation of particular features of the building, either as part of it or after severance from it;
(b) the making good, after the works are completed, of any damage caused to the building by the works;
(c) the reconstruction of the building or any part of it following the execution of any works, with the use of original materials so far as practicable and with such alterations of the interior of the building as may be specified in the conditions.
(2) A condition may also be imposed requiring specified details of the works (whether or not set out in the application) to be approved subsequently by the local planning authority or, in the case of consent granted by the Secretary of State, specifying whether such details are to be approved by the local planning authority or by him.
(3) Listed building consent for the demolition of a listed building may be granted subject to a condition that the building shall not be demolished before—
(a) a contract for the carrying out of works of redevelopment of the site has been made; and
(b) planning permission has been granted for the redevelopment for which the contract provides.
(4) Regulations under this Act ... may, in relation to applications made pursuant to a condition attached to listed building consent, make any provision corresponding to provision that may be made in relation to applications for such consent under section 10(3).
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.