Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
43 Offence where listed building enforcement notice not complied with.
(1) Where, at any time after the end of the period for compliance with the notice, any step required by a listed building enforcement notice to be taken has not been taken, the person who is then owner of the land is in breach of the notice. (2) If at any time the owner of the land is in breach of a listed building enforcement notice he shall be guilty of an offence. (3) An offence under this section may be charged by reference to any day or longer period of time and a person may be convicted of a second or subsequent offence under this section by reference to any period of time following the preceding conviction for such an offence. (4) In proceedings against any person for an offence under this section, it shall be a defence for him to show— (a) that he did everything he could be expected to do to secure that all the steps required by the notice were taken; or (b) that he was not served with a copy of the listed building enforcement notice and was not aware of its existence. (5) A person guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable on summary conviction, or on conviction on indictment, to a fine. (6) In determining the amount of any fine to be imposed on a person convicted of an offence under this section, the court shall in particular have regard to any financial benefit which has accrued or appears likely to accrue to him in consequence of the offence.
43 Offence where listed building enforcement notice not complied with.
(1) Where, at any time after the end of the period for compliance with the notice, any step required by a listed building enforcement notice to be taken has not been taken, the person who is then owner of the land is in breach of the notice. (2) If at any time the owner of the land is in breach of a listed building enforcement notice he shall be guilty of an offence. (3) An offence under this section may be charged by reference to any day or longer period of time and a person may be convicted of a second or subsequent offence under this section by reference to any period of time following the preceding conviction for such an offence. (4) In proceedings against any person for an offence under this section, it shall be a defence for him to show— (a) that he did everything he could be expected to do to secure that all the steps required by the notice were taken; or (b) that he was not served with a copy of the listed building enforcement notice and was not aware of its existence. (5) A person guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable on summary conviction, or on conviction on indictment, to a fine. (6) In determining the amount of any fine to be imposed on a person convicted of an offence under this section, the court shall in particular have regard to any financial benefit which has accrued or appears likely to accrue to him in consequence of the offence.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.