The Companies (Directors' Remuneration and Audit) (Amendment) Regulations 2025
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
4 Part 10
(1) In section 215 (payments for loss of office)— (a) in subsection (5) omit “or unquoted traded company”; (b) omit subsection (6). (2) In the heading to Chapter 4A of Part 10 omit “and traded companies”. (3) In section 226A (key definitions)— (a) in subsection (1)— (i) in the definition of “directors’ remuneration policy”, omit “, or of an unquoted traded company,”; (ii) omit the definition of “unquoted traded company”; (b) in subsection (2), omit “or unquoted traded company”; (c) in subsection (10), omit paragraph (b) and the “or” before it. (4) In section 226B (remuneration payments), in subsection (1)— (a) omit “or unquoted traded company”; (b) for paragraph (b) substitute— (b) the payment is approved by resolution of the members of the company. . (5) In section 226C (loss of office payments), in subsection (1)— (a) omit “or of an unquoted traded company”; (b) for paragraph (b) substitute— (b) the payment is approved by resolution of the members of the company. . (6) In section 226D (sections 226B and 226C: supplementary)— (a) in subsection (1)— (i) for “an amendment” substitute “a payment”; (ii) omit “to which the amendment relates”; (b) for subsection (2) substitute— (2) The memorandum must explain the ways in which the payment is inconsistent with the approved directors’ remuneration policy (within the meaning of the section in question). ; (c) In subsection (4), for “the amendment” substitute “a payment”; (d) in subsection (6)— (i) in the opening words, omit “or of an unquoted traded company”; (ii) in paragraph (a), omit “or (as the case may be) an unquoted traded company”. (7) In section 226E (payments made without approval: civil consequences)— (a) in subsection (3), omit “or of an unquoted traded company”; (b) in subsection (4), omit “or of an unquoted traded company”.
4 Part 10
(1) In section 215 (payments for loss of office)— (a) in subsection (5) omit “or unquoted traded company”; (b) omit subsection (6). (2) In the heading to Chapter 4A of Part 10 omit “and traded companies”. (3) In section 226A (key definitions)— (a) in subsection (1)— (i) in the definition of “directors’ remuneration policy”, omit “, or of an unquoted traded company,”; (ii) omit the definition of “unquoted traded company”; (b) in subsection (2), omit “or unquoted traded company”; (c) in subsection (10), omit paragraph (b) and the “or” before it. (4) In section 226B (remuneration payments), in subsection (1)— (a) omit “or unquoted traded company”; (b) for paragraph (b) substitute— (b) the payment is approved by resolution of the members of the company. . (5) In section 226C (loss of office payments), in subsection (1)— (a) omit “or of an unquoted traded company”; (b) for paragraph (b) substitute— (b) the payment is approved by resolution of the members of the company. . (6) In section 226D (sections 226B and 226C: supplementary)— (a) in subsection (1)— (i) for “an amendment” substitute “a payment”; (ii) omit “to which the amendment relates”; (b) for subsection (2) substitute— (2) The memorandum must explain the ways in which the payment is inconsistent with the approved directors’ remuneration policy (within the meaning of the section in question). ; (c) In subsection (4), for “the amendment” substitute “a payment”; (d) in subsection (6)— (i) in the opening words, omit “or of an unquoted traded company”; (ii) in paragraph (a), omit “or (as the case may be) an unquoted traded company”. (7) In section 226E (payments made without approval: civil consequences)— (a) in subsection (3), omit “or of an unquoted traded company”; (b) in subsection (4), omit “or of an unquoted traded company”.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.