Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3600/92 of 11 December 1992 laying down the detailed rules for the implementation of the first stage of the programme of work referred to in Article 8 (2) of Council Directive 91/414/EEC concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
Article 5
1. The Commission shall examine with the Committee the notifications referred to in Article 4 (2) and (4). 2. Following the examination referred to in paragraph 1, decisions shall be adopted on the following, according to the procedure under Article 19 of the Directive, in the form of a regulation: (a) the list of active substances adopted for assessment with a view to their possible inclusion in Annex I to the Directive; (b) designation of a rapporteur Member State for each active substance included in the list referred to in (a). 3. In the list referred to in paragraph 2 (a), certain substances with similar structures or chemical properties may be grouped together; if an active substance has been notified with different compositions which may lead to different toxicological properties or have different environmental effects, these may be listed separately. 4. For each substance adopted for assessment, the regulation referred to in paragraph 2 shall give: — the names of all producers who have presented a notification in accordance with Article 2 (1), or, where appropriate, the Member States which have presented a notification under Article 4 (4), — the name of the Member State designated as rapporteur, — the deadline for the submission to the rapporteur Member State of the dossiers referred to in Article 6 hereof, generally laying down a period of 12 months for the compilation of the documents, and for the submission by any interested parties of technical or scientific information with regard to the potentially dangerous effects of the substance or its residues on human and/or animal health and/or on the environment. 4A. From the time of the adoption of the Regulation referred to in paragraph 2, if a Member State envisages to take action to withdraw from the market or to restrict severely the use of a plant protection product containing an active substance listed in that regulation, where that action is based on information contained in the dossiers referred to in Article 6 or the report referred to in Article 7, the Member State shall as soon as possible inform the Commission and the other Member States, citing the reasons for its intended action. 5. When, during the reassessment referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 hereof, an imbalance becomes apparent in the responsibilities borne by the Member States as rapporteurs, it may be decided, using the procedure under Article 19 of the Directive, to designate a different Member State as rapporteur for a particular substance. Where such a different Member State has been designated as rapporteur Member State, the original Member State shall inform thereof the notifiers concerned and shall transfer to the newly designated rapporteur Member State all correspondence and information which it has received as rapporteur Member State for the active substance concerned. 6. When a notifier decides to end its participation in the programme of works for an active substance, he shall inform thereof the rapporteur Member State, the Commission and the other notifiers for the substance concerned. When a notifier agrees with another producer that he shall be replaced for the purposes of further participation in the programme of works under this Regulation, the notifier and such other producer shall inform the rapporteur Member State and the Commission by a common declaration agreeing that such other producer shall replace the original notifier in carrying out the notifier's duties as set out in Articles 6 to 8; they shall assure that the other notifiers for the substance concerned are informed as well.
Article 5
1. The Commission shall examine with the Committee the notifications referred to in Article 4 (2) and (4). 2. Following the examination referred to in paragraph 1, decisions shall be adopted on the following, according to the procedure under Article 19 of the Directive, in the form of a regulation: (a) the list of active substances adopted for assessment with a view to their possible inclusion in Annex I to the Directive; (b) designation of a rapporteur Member State for each active substance included in the list referred to in (a). 3. In the list referred to in paragraph 2 (a), certain substances with similar structures or chemical properties may be grouped together; if an active substance has been notified with different compositions which may lead to different toxicological properties or have different environmental effects, these may be listed separately. 4. For each substance adopted for assessment, the regulation referred to in paragraph 2 shall give: — the names of all producers who have presented a notification in accordance with Article 2 (1), or, where appropriate, the Member States which have presented a notification under Article 4 (4), — the name of the Member State designated as rapporteur, — the deadline for the submission to the rapporteur Member State of the dossiers referred to in Article 6 hereof, generally laying down a period of 12 months for the compilation of the documents, and for the submission by any interested parties of technical or scientific information with regard to the potentially dangerous effects of the substance or its residues on human and/or animal health and/or on the environment. 4A. From the time of the adoption of the Regulation referred to in paragraph 2, if a Member State envisages to take action to withdraw from the market or to restrict severely the use of a plant protection product containing an active substance listed in that regulation, where that action is based on information contained in the dossiers referred to in Article 6 or the report referred to in Article 7, the Member State shall as soon as possible inform the Commission and the other Member States, citing the reasons for its intended action. 5. When, during the reassessment referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 hereof, an imbalance becomes apparent in the responsibilities borne by the Member States as rapporteurs, it may be decided, using the procedure under Article 19 of the Directive, to designate a different Member State as rapporteur for a particular substance. Where such a different Member State has been designated as rapporteur Member State, the original Member State shall inform thereof the notifiers concerned and shall transfer to the newly designated rapporteur Member State all correspondence and information which it has received as rapporteur Member State for the active substance concerned. 6. When a notifier decides to end its participation in the programme of works for an active substance, he shall inform thereof the rapporteur Member State, the Commission and the other notifiers for the substance concerned. When a notifier agrees with another producer that he shall be replaced for the purposes of further participation in the programme of works under this Regulation, the notifier and such other producer shall inform the rapporteur Member State and the Commission by a common declaration agreeing that such other producer shall replace the original notifier in carrying out the notifier's duties as set out in Articles 6 to 8; they shall assure that the other notifiers for the substance concerned are informed as well.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.