Propose a change

Online Safety Act 2023

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

108 Amendment of Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001

(1) The Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001 is amended as follows. (2) In section 57(1) (retention of seized items), after paragraph (t) insert— (u) paragraph 8 of Schedule 12 to the Online Safety Act 2023. (3) In section 65 (meaning of “legal privilege”)— (a) after subsection (8B) insert— (8C) An item which is, or is comprised in, property which has been seized in exercise or purported exercise of the power of seizure conferred by paragraph 7(f), (j) or (k) of Schedule 12 to the Online Safety Act 2023 is to be taken for the purposes of this Part to be an item subject to legal privilege if, and only if, the seizure of that item was in contravention of paragraph 17(3) of that Schedule (privileged information or documents). ; (b) in subsection (9)— (i) at the end of paragraph (d) omit “or”; (ii) at the end of paragraph (e) insert “or”; (iii) before the closing words insert— (g) paragraph 7(f), (j) or (k) of Schedule 12 to the Online Safety Act 2023. (4) In Part 1 of Schedule 1 (powers of seizure to which section 50 of the Act applies), after paragraph 73U insert— Online Safety Act 2023 73V Each of the powers of seizure conferred by paragraph 7(f), (j) and (k) of Schedule 12 to the Online Safety Act 2023.

Your change, as a redline

108 Amendment of Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001

(1) The Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001 is amended as follows. (2) In section 57(1) (retention of seized items), after paragraph (t) insert— (u) paragraph 8 of Schedule 12 to the Online Safety Act 2023. (3) In section 65 (meaning of “legal privilege”)— (a) after subsection (8B) insert— (8C) An item which is, or is comprised in, property which has been seized in exercise or purported exercise of the power of seizure conferred by paragraph 7(f), (j) or (k) of Schedule 12 to the Online Safety Act 2023 is to be taken for the purposes of this Part to be an item subject to legal privilege if, and only if, the seizure of that item was in contravention of paragraph 17(3) of that Schedule (privileged information or documents). ; (b) in subsection (9)— (i) at the end of paragraph (d) omit “or”; (ii) at the end of paragraph (e) insert “or”; (iii) before the closing words insert— (g) paragraph 7(f), (j) or (k) of Schedule 12 to the Online Safety Act 2023. (4) In Part 1 of Schedule 1 (powers of seizure to which section 50 of the Act applies), after paragraph 73U insert— Online Safety Act 2023 73V Each of the powers of seizure conferred by paragraph 7(f), (j) and (k) of Schedule 12 to the Online Safety Act 2023.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds