Propose a change

Online Safety Act 2023

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

120 Admissibility of statements

(1) An explanation given, or information provided, by a person in response to a requirement imposed under or by virtue of section 100, 101 or 106 or paragraph 2(4)(e) or (f), 3(2), 4(2)(i) or (j) or 7(d) of Schedule 12, may, in criminal proceedings, only be used in evidence against that person— (a) on a prosecution for an offence under a provision listed in subsection (2), or (b) on a prosecution for any other offence where— (i) in giving evidence that person makes a statement inconsistent with that explanation or information, and (ii) evidence relating to that explanation or information is adduced, or a question relating to it is asked, by that person or on that person’s behalf. (2) Those provisions are— (a) section 69(1), (b) section 109(3), (c) section 110(4), (d) section 111(2), (e) section 112(3), (f) paragraph 18(1)(c) of Schedule 12, (g) section 5 of the Perjury Act 1911 (false statements made otherwise than on oath), (h) section 44(2) of the Criminal Law (Consolidation) (Scotland) Act 1995 (false statements made otherwise than on oath), and (i) Article 10 of the Perjury (Northern Ireland) Order 1979 (S.I. 1979/1714 (N.I. 19)) (false statutory declarations and other false unsworn statements).

Your change, as a redline

120 Admissibility of statements

(1) An explanation given, or information provided, by a person in response to a requirement imposed under or by virtue of section 100, 101 or 106 or paragraph 2(4)(e) or (f), 3(2), 4(2)(i) or (j) or 7(d) of Schedule 12, may, in criminal proceedings, only be used in evidence against that person— (a) on a prosecution for an offence under a provision listed in subsection (2), or (b) on a prosecution for any other offence where— (i) in giving evidence that person makes a statement inconsistent with that explanation or information, and (ii) evidence relating to that explanation or information is adduced, or a question relating to it is asked, by that person or on that person’s behalf. (2) Those provisions are— (a) section 69(1), (b) section 109(3), (c) section 110(4), (d) section 111(2), (e) section 112(3), (f) paragraph 18(1)(c) of Schedule 12, (g) section 5 of the Perjury Act 1911 (false statements made otherwise than on oath), (h) section 44(2) of the Criminal Law (Consolidation) (Scotland) Act 1995 (false statements made otherwise than on oath), and (i) Article 10 of the Perjury (Northern Ireland) Order 1979 (S.I. 1979/1714 (N.I. 19)) (false statutory declarations and other false unsworn statements).

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds