Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
126 Review and further notice under section 121(1)
(1) This section applies where OFCOM have given a provider of a Part 3 service a notice under section 121(1).
(2) The power conferred by section 125(11) includes power to revoke the notice if there are reasonable grounds for believing that the provider is failing to comply with it.
(3) If a notice is revoked as mentioned in subsection (2), OFCOM may give the provider a further notice under section 121(1) if they consider that it is necessary and proportionate to do so (taking into account the matters mentioned in section 124).
(4) Except where a notice under section 121(1) is revoked as mentioned in subsection (2), OFCOM must carry out a review of the provider’s compliance with the notice—
(a) in the case of a notice requiring the use of accredited technology, before the end of the period for which the notice has effect;
(b) in the case of a notice relating to the development or sourcing of technology, before the last date by which any step specified in the notice is required to be taken.
(5) In the case of a notice requiring the use of accredited technology, the review must consider—
(a) the extent to which the technology specified in the notice has been used, and
(b) the effectiveness of its use.
(6) Following the review, and after consultation with the provider, OFCOM may give the provider a further notice under section 121(1) if they consider that it is necessary and proportionate to do so (taking into account the matters mentioned in section 124).
(7) If a further notice under section 121(1) is given, subsections (3) to (6) apply again.
(8) A further notice under section 121(1) may impose different requirements from an earlier notice under that provision.
(9) Sections 122 (skilled person’s report) and 123 (warning notices) do not apply in relation to a further notice under section 121(1).
Your change, as a redline
126 Review and further notice under section 121(1)
(1) This section applies where OFCOM have given a provider of a Part 3 service a notice under section 121(1).
(2) The power conferred by section 125(11) includes power to revoke the notice if there are reasonable grounds for believing that the provider is failing to comply with it.
(3) If a notice is revoked as mentioned in subsection (2), OFCOM may give the provider a further notice under section 121(1) if they consider that it is necessary and proportionate to do so (taking into account the matters mentioned in section 124).
(4) Except where a notice under section 121(1) is revoked as mentioned in subsection (2), OFCOM must carry out a review of the provider’s compliance with the notice—
(a) in the case of a notice requiring the use of accredited technology, before the end of the period for which the notice has effect;
(b) in the case of a notice relating to the development or sourcing of technology, before the last date by which any step specified in the notice is required to be taken.
(5) In the case of a notice requiring the use of accredited technology, the review must consider—
(a) the extent to which the technology specified in the notice has been used, and
(b) the effectiveness of its use.
(6) Following the review, and after consultation with the provider, OFCOM may give the provider a further notice under section 121(1) if they consider that it is necessary and proportionate to do so (taking into account the matters mentioned in section 124).
(7) If a further notice under section 121(1) is given, subsections (3) to (6) apply again.
(8) A further notice under section 121(1) may impose different requirements from an earlier notice under that provision.
(9) Sections 122 (skilled person’s report) and 123 (warning notices) do not apply in relation to a further notice under section 121(1).
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.