Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
214 Offences regarding indecent photographs of children: OFCOM defence
England and Wales
(1) Section 1B of the Protection of Children Act 1978 (defence to offence relating to indecent photographs of children) is amended in accordance with subsections (2) and (3).
(2) In subsection (1)—
(a) for “he”, in each place, substitute “the defendant”;
(b) for “him”, in each place, substitute “the defendant”;
(c) omit “or” at the end of paragraph (b);
(d) at the end of paragraph (c) insert
, or
(d) the defendant—
(i) was at the time of the offence charged a member of OFCOM, employed or engaged by OFCOM, or assisting OFCOM in the exercise of any of their online safety functions (within the meaning of section 235 of the Online Safety Act 2023), and
(ii) made the photograph or pseudo-photograph for the purposes of OFCOM’s exercise of any of those functions.
(3) After subsection (2) insert—
(3) In this section “OFCOM” means the Office of Communications.
Scotland
(4) Section 52 of the Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982 (indecent photographs of children) is amended in accordance with subsections (5) and (6).
(5) After subsection (4) insert—
(4A) Where a person is charged with an offence under subsection (1)(a) of making an indecent photograph or pseudo-photograph of a child, it shall be a defence for the person to prove that—
(a) at the time of the offence charged, the person was a member of OFCOM, employed or engaged by OFCOM, or assisting OFCOM in the exercise of any of their online safety functions (within the meaning of section 235 of the Online Safety Act 2023), and
(b) the person made the photograph or pseudo-photograph for the purposes of OFCOM’s exercise of any of those functions.
(6) In subsection (8), after paragraph (d) insert—
(e) “OFCOM” means the Office of Communications.
Northern Ireland
(7) Article 3A of the Protection of Children (Northern Ireland) Order 1978 (S.I. 1978/1047 (N.I. 17)) (defence to offence relating to indecent photographs of children) is amended in accordance with subsections (8) and (9).
(8) In paragraph (1)—
(a) for “he”, in each place, substitute “the defendant”;
(b) for “him”, in each place, substitute “the defendant”;
(c) omit “or” at the end of sub-paragraph (b);
(d) at the end of sub-paragraph (c) insert
, or
(d) the defendant—
(i) was at the time of the offence charged a member of OFCOM, employed or engaged by OFCOM, or assisting OFCOM in the exercise of any of their online safety functions (within the meaning of section 235 of the Online Safety Act 2023), and
(ii) made the photograph or pseudo-photograph for the purposes of OFCOM’s exercise of any of those functions.
(9) After paragraph (2) insert—
(3) In this Article “OFCOM” means the Office of Communications.
Your change, as a redline
214 Offences regarding indecent photographs of children: OFCOM defence
England and Wales
(1) Section 1B of the Protection of Children Act 1978 (defence to offence relating to indecent photographs of children) is amended in accordance with subsections (2) and (3).
(2) In subsection (1)—
(a) for “he”, in each place, substitute “the defendant”;
(b) for “him”, in each place, substitute “the defendant”;
(c) omit “or” at the end of paragraph (b);
(d) at the end of paragraph (c) insert
, or
(d) the defendant—
(i) was at the time of the offence charged a member of OFCOM, employed or engaged by OFCOM, or assisting OFCOM in the exercise of any of their online safety functions (within the meaning of section 235 of the Online Safety Act 2023), and
(ii) made the photograph or pseudo-photograph for the purposes of OFCOM’s exercise of any of those functions.
(3) After subsection (2) insert—
(3) In this section “OFCOM” means the Office of Communications.
Scotland
(4) Section 52 of the Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982 (indecent photographs of children) is amended in accordance with subsections (5) and (6).
(5) After subsection (4) insert—
(4A) Where a person is charged with an offence under subsection (1)(a) of making an indecent photograph or pseudo-photograph of a child, it shall be a defence for the person to prove that—
(a) at the time of the offence charged, the person was a member of OFCOM, employed or engaged by OFCOM, or assisting OFCOM in the exercise of any of their online safety functions (within the meaning of section 235 of the Online Safety Act 2023), and
(b) the person made the photograph or pseudo-photograph for the purposes of OFCOM’s exercise of any of those functions.
(6) In subsection (8), after paragraph (d) insert—
(e) “OFCOM” means the Office of Communications.
Northern Ireland
(7) Article 3A of the Protection of Children (Northern Ireland) Order 1978 (S.I. 1978/1047 (N.I. 17)) (defence to offence relating to indecent photographs of children) is amended in accordance with subsections (8) and (9).
(8) In paragraph (1)—
(a) for “he”, in each place, substitute “the defendant”;
(b) for “him”, in each place, substitute “the defendant”;
(c) omit “or” at the end of sub-paragraph (b);
(d) at the end of sub-paragraph (c) insert
, or
(d) the defendant—
(i) was at the time of the offence charged a member of OFCOM, employed or engaged by OFCOM, or assisting OFCOM in the exercise of any of their online safety functions (within the meaning of section 235 of the Online Safety Act 2023), and
(ii) made the photograph or pseudo-photograph for the purposes of OFCOM’s exercise of any of those functions.
(9) After paragraph (2) insert—
(3) In this Article “OFCOM” means the Office of Communications.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.