Propose a change

Online Safety Act 2023

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

50 Effects of codes of practice

(1) A failure by a provider of a Part 3 service to act in accordance with a provision of a code of practice does not of itself make the provider liable to legal proceedings in a court or tribunal. (2) A code of practice is admissible in evidence in legal proceedings. (3) In any proceedings in a court or tribunal, the court or tribunal must take into account a provision of a code of practice in determining a question arising in the proceedings if— (a) the question relates to a time when the provision was in force, and (b) the provision appears to the court or tribunal to be relevant to the question. (4) OFCOM must take into account a provision of a code of practice in determining a question arising in connection with their exercise of any relevant function if— (a) the question relates to a time when the provision was in force, and (b) the provision appears to OFCOM to be relevant to the question. (5) In this section— “code of practice” means a code of practice published under section 46; “relevant functions” means OFCOM’s functions under— Chapter 4 of Part 7 (information), Chapter 5 of Part 7 (notices to deal with terrorism content and CSEA content), Chapter 6 of Part 7 (enforcement), and Chapter 2 of Part 8 (super-complaints).

Your change, as a redline

50 Effects of codes of practice

(1) A failure by a provider of a Part 3 service to act in accordance with a provision of a code of practice does not of itself make the provider liable to legal proceedings in a court or tribunal. (2) A code of practice is admissible in evidence in legal proceedings. (3) In any proceedings in a court or tribunal, the court or tribunal must take into account a provision of a code of practice in determining a question arising in the proceedings if— (a) the question relates to a time when the provision was in force, and (b) the provision appears to the court or tribunal to be relevant to the question. (4) OFCOM must take into account a provision of a code of practice in determining a question arising in connection with their exercise of any relevant function if— (a) the question relates to a time when the provision was in force, and (b) the provision appears to OFCOM to be relevant to the question. (5) In this section— “code of practice” means a code of practice published under section 46; “relevant functions” means OFCOM’s functions under— Chapter 4 of Part 7 (information), Chapter 5 of Part 7 (notices to deal with terrorism content and CSEA content), Chapter 6 of Part 7 (enforcement), and Chapter 2 of Part 8 (super-complaints).

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds