Propose a change

The Unmanned Aircraft (Offences and Consequential Amendments) Regulations 2025

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

5 Penalties

(1) Any person guilty of an offence under regulation 2(2) or regulation 3(2) is liable on summary conviction— (a) in England and Wales to a fine, or (b) in Scotland or Northern Ireland to a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale. (2) Any person guilty of an offence under regulation 2(3) is liable on summary conviction to a fine— (a) not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale if the offence relates to contravention of a relevant requirement referred to in— (i) regulation 2(5)(a) (registration); (ii) regulation 2(5)(b) (display of registration number); (iii) regulation 2(5)(d)(i) (designation of remote pilot); (iv) regulation 2(5)(d)(ii) (competency of remote pilot); (v) regulation 2(5)(d)(iii) (geo-awareness updates); (vi) regulation 2(6)(a) (registration); (vii) regulation 2(6)(b) (display of registration number); (viii) regulation 2(6)(d)(ii) (designation of remote pilot or allocation of responsibilities for autonomous operations); (ix) regulation 2(6)(d)(iii) (competency of remote pilot); (x) regulation 2(6)(d)(iv) (operations manual); (xi) regulation 2(6)(d)(vi) (record-keeping); (xii) regulation 2(6)(d)(vii) (access to records etc.); (xiii) regulation 2(7)(a) (registration); (xiv) regulation 2(7)(b) (display of registration number); (xv) regulation 2(7)(d)(ii) (designation of remote pilot or allocation of responsibilities for autonomous operations); (xvi) regulation 2(7)(d)(iii) (competency of remote pilot); (xvii) regulation 2(7)(d)(iv) (operations manual); (xviii) regulation 2(7)(d)(vi) (record-keeping); (xix) regulation 2(7)(e)(iv) (LUC record-keeping); (xx) regulation 2(7)(e)(v) (access to records etc.); (xxi) regulation 2(9)(a) (registration), or (xxii) regulation 2(9)(b) (display of registration number); (b) not exceeding level 4 on the standard scale in any other case. (3) Any person guilty of an offence under regulation 3(3) is liable on summary conviction to a fine— (a) not exceeding level 2 on the standard scale if the offence relates to contravention of a relevant requirement referred to in regulation 3(5)(c) or (7)(c) (requirements for remote pilot to carry proof of competency); (b) not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale if the offence relates to contravention of a relevant requirement referred to in regulation 3(5)(b), (5)(e) or (7)(b) (requirements for remote pilot to have appropriate competency and verify MTOM); (c) not exceeding level 4 on the standard scale in any other case. (4) Any person guilty of an offence under regulation 4(2) is liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale.

Your change, as a redline

5 Penalties

(1) Any person guilty of an offence under regulation 2(2) or regulation 3(2) is liable on summary conviction— (a) in England and Wales to a fine, or (b) in Scotland or Northern Ireland to a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale. (2) Any person guilty of an offence under regulation 2(3) is liable on summary conviction to a fine— (a) not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale if the offence relates to contravention of a relevant requirement referred to in— (i) regulation 2(5)(a) (registration); (ii) regulation 2(5)(b) (display of registration number); (iii) regulation 2(5)(d)(i) (designation of remote pilot); (iv) regulation 2(5)(d)(ii) (competency of remote pilot); (v) regulation 2(5)(d)(iii) (geo-awareness updates); (vi) regulation 2(6)(a) (registration); (vii) regulation 2(6)(b) (display of registration number); (viii) regulation 2(6)(d)(ii) (designation of remote pilot or allocation of responsibilities for autonomous operations); (ix) regulation 2(6)(d)(iii) (competency of remote pilot); (x) regulation 2(6)(d)(iv) (operations manual); (xi) regulation 2(6)(d)(vi) (record-keeping); (xii) regulation 2(6)(d)(vii) (access to records etc.); (xiii) regulation 2(7)(a) (registration); (xiv) regulation 2(7)(b) (display of registration number); (xv) regulation 2(7)(d)(ii) (designation of remote pilot or allocation of responsibilities for autonomous operations); (xvi) regulation 2(7)(d)(iii) (competency of remote pilot); (xvii) regulation 2(7)(d)(iv) (operations manual); (xviii) regulation 2(7)(d)(vi) (record-keeping); (xix) regulation 2(7)(e)(iv) (LUC record-keeping); (xx) regulation 2(7)(e)(v) (access to records etc.); (xxi) regulation 2(9)(a) (registration), or (xxii) regulation 2(9)(b) (display of registration number); (b) not exceeding level 4 on the standard scale in any other case. (3) Any person guilty of an offence under regulation 3(3) is liable on summary conviction to a fine— (a) not exceeding level 2 on the standard scale if the offence relates to contravention of a relevant requirement referred to in regulation 3(5)(c) or (7)(c) (requirements for remote pilot to carry proof of competency); (b) not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale if the offence relates to contravention of a relevant requirement referred to in regulation 3(5)(b), (5)(e) or (7)(b) (requirements for remote pilot to have appropriate competency and verify MTOM); (c) not exceeding level 4 on the standard scale in any other case. (4) Any person guilty of an offence under regulation 4(2) is liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds