Family Law Act 1996
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
45 Ex parte orders.
(1) The court may, in any case where it considers that it is just and convenient to do so, make an occupation order or a non-molestation order even though the respondent has not been given such notice of the proceedings as would otherwise be required by rules of court. (2) In determining whether to exercise its powers under subsection (1), the court shall have regard to all the circumstances including— (a) any risk of significant harm to the applicant or a relevant child, attributable to conduct of the respondent, if the order is not made immediately; (b) whether it is likely that the applicant will be deterred or prevented from pursuing the application if an order is not made immediately; and (c) whether there is reason to believe that the respondent is aware of the proceedings but is deliberately evading service and that the applicant or a relevant child will be seriously prejudiced by the delay involved in effecting substituted service. (3) If the court makes an order by virtue of subsection (1) it must afford the respondent an opportunity to make representations relating to the order as soon as just and convenient at a full hearing. (4) If, at a full hearing, the court makes an occupation order ( “the full order”), then— (a) for the purposes of calculating the maximum period for which the full order may be made to have effect, the relevant section is to apply as if the period for which the full order will have effect began on the date on which the initial order first had effect; and (b) the provisions of section 36(10) or 38(6) as to the extension of orders are to apply as if the full order and the initial order were a single order. (5) In this section— “full hearing” means a hearing of which notice has been given to all the parties in accordance with rules of court; “initial order” means an occupation order made by virtue of subsection (1); and “relevant section” means section 33(10), 35(10), 36(10), 37(5) or 38(6).
45 Ex parte orders.
(1) The court may, in any case where it considers that it is just and convenient to do so, make an occupation order or a non-molestation order even though the respondent has not been given such notice of the proceedings as would otherwise be required by rules of court. (2) In determining whether to exercise its powers under subsection (1), the court shall have regard to all the circumstances including— (a) any risk of significant harm to the applicant or a relevant child, attributable to conduct of the respondent, if the order is not made immediately; (b) whether it is likely that the applicant will be deterred or prevented from pursuing the application if an order is not made immediately; and (c) whether there is reason to believe that the respondent is aware of the proceedings but is deliberately evading service and that the applicant or a relevant child will be seriously prejudiced by the delay involved in effecting substituted service. (3) If the court makes an order by virtue of subsection (1) it must afford the respondent an opportunity to make representations relating to the order as soon as just and convenient at a full hearing. (4) If, at a full hearing, the court makes an occupation order ( “the full order”), then— (a) for the purposes of calculating the maximum period for which the full order may be made to have effect, the relevant section is to apply as if the period for which the full order will have effect began on the date on which the initial order first had effect; and (b) the provisions of section 36(10) or 38(6) as to the extension of orders are to apply as if the full order and the initial order were a single order. (5) In this section— “full hearing” means a hearing of which notice has been given to all the parties in accordance with rules of court; “initial order” means an occupation order made by virtue of subsection (1); and “relevant section” means section 33(10), 35(10), 36(10), 37(5) or 38(6).
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.