Family Law Act 1996
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
63J Arrest under warrant
(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (2) An interested party may apply to the relevant judge for the issue of a warrant for the arrest of a person if the interested party considers that the person has failed to comply with a forced marriage protection order or is otherwise in contempt of court in relation to the order. (3) The relevant judge must not issue a warrant on an application under subsection (2) unless— (a) the application is substantiated on oath; and (b) the relevant judge has reasonable grounds for believing that the person to be arrested has failed to comply with the order or is otherwise in contempt of court in relation to the order. (4) In this section “interested party”, in relation to a forced marriage protection order, means— (a) the person being protected by the order; (b) (if a different person) the person who applied for the order; or (c) any other person; but no application may be made under subsection (2) by a person falling within paragraph (c) without the leave of the relevant judge.
63J Arrest under warrant
(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (2) An interested party may apply to the relevant judge for the issue of a warrant for the arrest of a person if the interested party considers that the person has failed to comply with a forced marriage protection order or is otherwise in contempt of court in relation to the order. (3) The relevant judge must not issue a warrant on an application under subsection (2) unless— (a) the application is substantiated on oath; and (b) the relevant judge has reasonable grounds for believing that the person to be arrested has failed to comply with the order or is otherwise in contempt of court in relation to the order. (4) In this section “interested party”, in relation to a forced marriage protection order, means— (a) the person being protected by the order; (b) (if a different person) the person who applied for the order; or (c) any other person; but no application may be made under subsection (2) by a person falling within paragraph (c) without the leave of the relevant judge.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.