Propose a change

Social Security Administration Act 1992

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

10 Obligations of claimants

(1) Subject to subsection (3) below, regulations may provide for disqualifying a claimant for the receipt of industrial injuries benefit— (a) for failure without good cause to comply with any requirement of regulations to which this subsection applies (including in the case of a claim for industrial death benefit, a failure on the part of some other person to give the prescribed notice of the relevant accident); (b) for wilful obstruction of, or other misconduct in connection with, any examination or treatment to which he is required under regulations to which this subsection applies to submit himself, or in proceedings under this Act for the determination of his right to benefit or to its receipt, or for suspending proceedings on the claim or payment of benefit as the case may be, in the case of any such failure, obstruction or misconduct. (2) The regulations to which subsection (1) above applies are— (a) any regulations made by virtue of section 5(1)(h), (i) or (1) above, so far as relating to industrial injuries benefit; and (b) regulations made by virtue of section 8 or 9 above. (3) Regulations under subsection (1) above providing for disqualification for the receipt of benefit for any of the following matters, that is to say— (a) for failure to comply with the requirements of regulations under section 9(1) or (2) above; (b) for obstruction of, or misconduct in connection with, medical examination or treatment, shall not be made so as to disentitle a claimant to a benefit for a period exceeding 6 weeks on any disqualification.

Your change, as a redline

10 Obligations of claimants

(1) Subject to subsection (3) below, regulations may provide for disqualifying a claimant for the receipt of industrial injuries benefit— (a) for failure without good cause to comply with any requirement of regulations to which this subsection applies (including in the case of a claim for industrial death benefit, a failure on the part of some other person to give the prescribed notice of the relevant accident); (b) for wilful obstruction of, or other misconduct in connection with, any examination or treatment to which he is required under regulations to which this subsection applies to submit himself, or in proceedings under this Act for the determination of his right to benefit or to its receipt, or for suspending proceedings on the claim or payment of benefit as the case may be, in the case of any such failure, obstruction or misconduct. (2) The regulations to which subsection (1) above applies are— (a) any regulations made by virtue of section 5(1)(h), (i) or (1) above, so far as relating to industrial injuries benefit; and (b) regulations made by virtue of section 8 or 9 above. (3) Regulations under subsection (1) above providing for disqualification for the receipt of benefit for any of the following matters, that is to say— (a) for failure to comply with the requirements of regulations under section 9(1) or (2) above; (b) for obstruction of, or misconduct in connection with, medical examination or treatment, shall not be made so as to disentitle a claimant to a benefit for a period exceeding 6 weeks on any disqualification.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds