Regional Assemblies (Preparations) Act 2003 (repealed)
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
15 Review procedure
The provisions of the 1992 Act specified in the left hand column of the Table apply to a review carried out by the Boundary Committee for England in pursuance of a direction under section 13 of this Act as they apply to a review carried out by them under Part 2 of that Act subject to the modifications specified in the right hand column: Section 14 | (a) In subsection (1) for references to the Electoral Commission substitute references to the Boundary Committee for England; (b) In subsection (1)(b) for “independently of any such change” substitute “ otherwise ”; (c) Subsection (1)(c) must be ignored; (d) Subsection (3)(b) does not apply to a parish; (e) In subsection (3) paragraphs (d), (e), (f) and (g) must be ignored; (f) Subsection (4) must be ignored; (g) Subsection (5)(ba) must be ignored; (h) In subsection (6) omit “subject to any necessary electoral changes”; (i) Subsection (8) must be ignored. Section 15 | (a) In subsection (1)(b) omit “under this Part”; (b) Subsections (2) and (6) to (8) must be ignored; (c) In subsection (3) omit “or (2)(c)”; (d) In subsection (4) for references to the Electoral Commission substitute references to the Secretary of State. Section 15A | (a) For “Where the Electoral Commission consider it appropriate they may direct the Boundary Committee for England” substitute “ If the Boundary Committee for England think it appropriate they may decide ”; (b) In paragraph (c) for “Electoral Commission” substitute “ Secretary of State ”. Section 16 | References to the Electoral Commission must be ignored.
15 Review procedure
The provisions of the 1992 Act specified in the left hand column of the Table apply to a review carried out by the Boundary Committee for England in pursuance of a direction under section 13 of this Act as they apply to a review carried out by them under Part 2 of that Act subject to the modifications specified in the right hand column: Section 14 | (a) In subsection (1) for references to the Electoral Commission substitute references to the Boundary Committee for England; (b) In subsection (1)(b) for “independently of any such change” substitute “ otherwise ”; (c) Subsection (1)(c) must be ignored; (d) Subsection (3)(b) does not apply to a parish; (e) In subsection (3) paragraphs (d), (e), (f) and (g) must be ignored; (f) Subsection (4) must be ignored; (g) Subsection (5)(ba) must be ignored; (h) In subsection (6) omit “subject to any necessary electoral changes”; (i) Subsection (8) must be ignored. Section 15 | (a) In subsection (1)(b) omit “under this Part”; (b) Subsections (2) and (6) to (8) must be ignored; (c) In subsection (3) omit “or (2)(c)”; (d) In subsection (4) for references to the Electoral Commission substitute references to the Secretary of State. Section 15A | (a) For “Where the Electoral Commission consider it appropriate they may direct the Boundary Committee for England” substitute “ If the Boundary Committee for England think it appropriate they may decide ”; (b) In paragraph (c) for “Electoral Commission” substitute “ Secretary of State ”. Section 16 | References to the Electoral Commission must be ignored.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.