Propose a change

Medical Act 1983

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

10B Professional traineeships carried out in ... relevant European States, etc.

(A1) This section applies for the purposes of determining whether a person who— (a) is a national of a relevant European state, (b) holds a primary United Kingdom qualification, and (c) has applied, before IP completion day, for registration under section 3(1)(a), has satisfactorily completed an acceptable programme for doctors who are provisionally registered. (1) If such a programme includes a requirement to carry out a professional traineeship of a particular standard, a professional traineeship of an equivalent standard that has been carried out in a relevant European State ... is treated as meeting that requirement. (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3) Any person who— (a) is not a national of a relevant European State; but (b) is, by virtue of any enforceable EU right, entitled to be treated, for the purposes of access to and the practice of the medical profession, no less favourably than a national of such a State, must be treated for the purposes of subsection (A1) as if the person were such a national.

Your change, as a redline

10B Professional traineeships carried out in ... relevant European States, etc.

(A1) This section applies for the purposes of determining whether a person who— (a) is a national of a relevant European state, (b) holds a primary United Kingdom qualification, and (c) has applied, before IP completion day, for registration under section 3(1)(a), has satisfactorily completed an acceptable programme for doctors who are provisionally registered. (1) If such a programme includes a requirement to carry out a professional traineeship of a particular standard, a professional traineeship of an equivalent standard that has been carried out in a relevant European State ... is treated as meeting that requirement. (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3) Any person who— (a) is not a national of a relevant European State; but (b) is, by virtue of any enforceable EU right, entitled to be treated, for the purposes of access to and the practice of the medical profession, no less favourably than a national of such a State, must be treated for the purposes of subsection (A1) as if the person were such a national.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds