The Police (Vetting) Regulations 2025
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
4F Duty to provide police candidate with detailed reasons for certain decisions
(1) Where a vetting authority makes a decision under this Part to— (a) grant a police candidate vetting clearance subject to conditions, (b) decline to grant a police candidate vetting clearance, (c) add or vary a condition to which a police candidate’s vetting clearance is subject, or (d) revoke a police candidate’s vetting clearance, it must, subject to paragraph (2), provide the police candidate with detailed reasons in writing for its decision. (2) The vetting authority must not provide the police candidate with information in so far as it considers that any of the reasons for preventing disclosure of information listed in regulation 8(2)(a) to (g) apply to that information; and for the purposes of this paragraph, regulation 8(2)(d) is to be read as if “other” were omitted.
4F Duty to provide police candidate with detailed reasons for certain decisions
(1) Where a vetting authority makes a decision under this Part to— (a) grant a police candidate vetting clearance subject to conditions, (b) decline to grant a police candidate vetting clearance, (c) add or vary a condition to which a police candidate’s vetting clearance is subject, or (d) revoke a police candidate’s vetting clearance, it must, subject to paragraph (2), provide the police candidate with detailed reasons in writing for its decision. (2) The vetting authority must not provide the police candidate with information in so far as it considers that any of the reasons for preventing disclosure of information listed in regulation 8(2)(a) to (g) apply to that information; and for the purposes of this paragraph, regulation 8(2)(d) is to be read as if “other” were omitted.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.