The Police (Vetting) Regulations 2025
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
5A Review of vetting clearance
(1) A vetting authority may from time to time carry out such checks as are necessary to assess whether, in respect of a police officer to whom it has granted vetting clearance— (a) there is information which indicates that the officer may no longer be suitable to hold vetting clearance, or (b) it is appropriate to add, vary or remove a condition to which the officer’s vetting clearance is subject. (2) A vetting authority must carry out a criminal history check in respect of a police officer to whom it has granted vetting clearance if— (a) the vetting authority has considered information concerning a change in the officer’s personal circumstances or other matter, and (b) the information does not, on its own, indicate that the officer may no longer be suitable to hold vetting clearance, but risk remains that warrants further assessment. (3) A vetting authority must assess whether either of the conditions mentioned in paragraph (1)(a) and (b) applies in respect of a police officer to whom it has granted vetting clearance if the officer— (a) has been subject to misconduct proceedings or an accelerated misconduct hearing, and (b) has not been dismissed. (4) Following a review of a police officer’s vetting clearance, a vetting authority may, if it considers it appropriate to do so, add, vary or remove a condition to which the vetting clearance is subject.
5A Review of vetting clearance
(1) A vetting authority may from time to time carry out such checks as are necessary to assess whether, in respect of a police officer to whom it has granted vetting clearance— (a) there is information which indicates that the officer may no longer be suitable to hold vetting clearance, or (b) it is appropriate to add, vary or remove a condition to which the officer’s vetting clearance is subject. (2) A vetting authority must carry out a criminal history check in respect of a police officer to whom it has granted vetting clearance if— (a) the vetting authority has considered information concerning a change in the officer’s personal circumstances or other matter, and (b) the information does not, on its own, indicate that the officer may no longer be suitable to hold vetting clearance, but risk remains that warrants further assessment. (3) A vetting authority must assess whether either of the conditions mentioned in paragraph (1)(a) and (b) applies in respect of a police officer to whom it has granted vetting clearance if the officer— (a) has been subject to misconduct proceedings or an accelerated misconduct hearing, and (b) has not been dismissed. (4) Following a review of a police officer’s vetting clearance, a vetting authority may, if it considers it appropriate to do so, add, vary or remove a condition to which the vetting clearance is subject.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.