Criminal Justice (Terrorism and Conspiracy) Act 1998
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
SCHEDULE 2 Repeals and Revocations
Section 9(2). Part I Proscribed Organisations Part II Conspiracy Chapter | Short title | Extent of repeal 1977 c. 45. | Criminal Law Act 1977. | In section 1, subsections (1A) and (1B), the words in subsection (4) from “except that” to the end, and subsections (5) and (6). S.I. 1983/1120 (N.I. 13). | Criminal Attempts and Conspiracy (Northern Ireland) Order 1983 | In Article 9, paragraphs (1A) and (1B), the words in paragraph (4) from “except that” to the end, and paragraphs (5) and (6). 1990 c. 18. | Computer Misuse Act 1990. | Section 7(1) and (2). Section 8(2) and (6)(b). Section 9(2)(b). Section 16(5), (6) and (8)(a). 1993 c. 36. | Criminal Justice Act 1993. | Section 5(1). In section 6(1), the words “by virtue of section 1A of the Criminal Law Act 1977, or”. 1995 c. 39. | Criminal Law (Consolidation) (Scotland) Act 1995. | In section 16A, in subsection (1) the words “conspiracy or” and “the criminal purpose or, as the case may be,”, in subsection (2) the words “the criminal purpose or, as the case may be,” and “conspiracy or”, in subsection (3) paragraph (a) and the words “(b) in the case of proceedings charging incitement” and in subsection (5) paragraph (a) and the words “(b) in relation to proceedings charging incitement”. 1996 c. 29. | Sexual Offences (Conspiracy and Incitement) Act 1996. | Section 1. In section 3, the words “1(3) or” in subsection (2), subsection (3), the words “1 or” in subsection (6) and subsection (7). Section 4(b) and (c). In section 7(3), the word “1”. S.I. 1996/3160 (N.I. 24). | Criminal Justice (Northern Ireland) Order 1996. | Article 42(1)(b). In Article 43(2), the words “by virtue of Article 9A of that Order, or”.
SCHEDULE 2 Repeals and Revocations
Section 9(2). Part I Proscribed Organisations Part II Conspiracy Chapter | Short title | Extent of repeal 1977 c. 45. | Criminal Law Act 1977. | In section 1, subsections (1A) and (1B), the words in subsection (4) from “except that” to the end, and subsections (5) and (6). S.I. 1983/1120 (N.I. 13). | Criminal Attempts and Conspiracy (Northern Ireland) Order 1983 | In Article 9, paragraphs (1A) and (1B), the words in paragraph (4) from “except that” to the end, and paragraphs (5) and (6). 1990 c. 18. | Computer Misuse Act 1990. | Section 7(1) and (2). Section 8(2) and (6)(b). Section 9(2)(b). Section 16(5), (6) and (8)(a). 1993 c. 36. | Criminal Justice Act 1993. | Section 5(1). In section 6(1), the words “by virtue of section 1A of the Criminal Law Act 1977, or”. 1995 c. 39. | Criminal Law (Consolidation) (Scotland) Act 1995. | In section 16A, in subsection (1) the words “conspiracy or” and “the criminal purpose or, as the case may be,”, in subsection (2) the words “the criminal purpose or, as the case may be,” and “conspiracy or”, in subsection (3) paragraph (a) and the words “(b) in the case of proceedings charging incitement” and in subsection (5) paragraph (a) and the words “(b) in relation to proceedings charging incitement”. 1996 c. 29. | Sexual Offences (Conspiracy and Incitement) Act 1996. | Section 1. In section 3, the words “1(3) or” in subsection (2), subsection (3), the words “1 or” in subsection (6) and subsection (7). Section 4(b) and (c). In section 7(3), the word “1”. S.I. 1996/3160 (N.I. 24). | Criminal Justice (Northern Ireland) Order 1996. | Article 42(1)(b). In Article 43(2), the words “by virtue of Article 9A of that Order, or”.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.