Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Section 109
ICTA
1 In section 393A of ICTA (losses: set off against profits), in subsections (2C)(b) and (11)(a), for “abandonment expenditure” substitute “ general decommissioning expenditure ”.
CAA 2001
2 CAA 2001 is amended as follows.
3 In section 26 (demolition costs), in subsection (5), for “abandonment expenditure” substitute “ general decommissioning expenditure ”.
4 In section 57 (available qualifying expenditure), in the entry in subsection (2) relating to section 165(3) of CAA 2001, for “abandonment expenditure” substitute “ general decommissioning expenditure ”.
5 (1) Section 164 (abandonment expenditure incurred before cessation of ring fence trade) is amended as follows.
(2) In the heading, for “abandonment expenditure” substitute “ general decommissioning expenditure ”.
(3) In subsections (1), (2)(a), (3)(a), (4)(a) and (5), for “abandonment expenditure” substitute “ general decommissioning expenditure ”.
6 (1) Section 165 (abandonment expenditure within 3 years of ceasing ring fence trade) is amended as follows.
(2) In the heading, for “abandonment expenditure” substitute “ general decommissioning expenditure ”.
(3) In subsection (1)(b) and (c), for “abandonment expenditure” substitute “ general decommissioning expenditure ”.
(4) In subsection (3)—
(a) in paragraph (a), for “relevant abandonment cost” substitute “ relevant decommissioning cost ”, and
(b) in paragraph (b), for “abandonment expenditure” substitute “ general decommissioning expenditure ”.
(5) In subsection (4), in the definition of “the relevant abandonment cost”—
(a) for “relevant abandonment cost” substitute “ relevant decommissioning cost ”, and
(b) for “abandonment expenditure”, in each place, substitute “ general decommissioning expenditure ”.
Section 109
ICTA
1 In section 393A of ICTA (losses: set off against profits), in subsections (2C)(b) and (11)(a), for “abandonment expenditure” substitute “ general decommissioning expenditure ”.
CAA 2001
2 CAA 2001 is amended as follows.
3 In section 26 (demolition costs), in subsection (5), for “abandonment expenditure” substitute “ general decommissioning expenditure ”.
4 In section 57 (available qualifying expenditure), in the entry in subsection (2) relating to section 165(3) of CAA 2001, for “abandonment expenditure” substitute “ general decommissioning expenditure ”.
5 (1) Section 164 (abandonment expenditure incurred before cessation of ring fence trade) is amended as follows.
(2) In the heading, for “abandonment expenditure” substitute “ general decommissioning expenditure ”.
(3) In subsections (1), (2)(a), (3)(a), (4)(a) and (5), for “abandonment expenditure” substitute “ general decommissioning expenditure ”.
6 (1) Section 165 (abandonment expenditure within 3 years of ceasing ring fence trade) is amended as follows.
(2) In the heading, for “abandonment expenditure” substitute “ general decommissioning expenditure ”.
(3) In subsection (1)(b) and (c), for “abandonment expenditure” substitute “ general decommissioning expenditure ”.
(4) In subsection (3)—
(a) in paragraph (a), for “relevant abandonment cost” substitute “ relevant decommissioning cost ”, and
(b) in paragraph (b), for “abandonment expenditure” substitute “ general decommissioning expenditure ”.
(5) In subsection (4), in the definition of “the relevant abandonment cost”—
(a) for “relevant abandonment cost” substitute “ relevant decommissioning cost ”, and
(b) for “abandonment expenditure”, in each place, substitute “ general decommissioning expenditure ”.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.