Propose a change

Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

41 Power of appellate courts in Scotland to suspend disqualification.

(1) This section applies where a person has been convicted by or before a court in Scotland of an offence involving obligatory or discretionary disqualification and has been ordered to be disqualified; and in the following provisions of this section— (a) any reference to a person ordered to be disqualified is to be construed as a reference to a person so convicted and so ordered to be disqualified, and (b) any reference to his sentence includes a reference to the order of disqualification and to any other order made on his conviction and, accordingly, any reference to an appeal against his sentence includes a reference to an appeal against any order forming part of his sentence. (2) Where a person ordered to be disqualified appeals ..., whether on appeal against a summary conviction or a conviction on indictment or his sentence, the court hearing the appeal may, if it thinks fit, suspend the disqualification on such terms as it thinks fit. The powers conferred by this subsection on the court may be exercised by any single judge of the court. (2A) Where the court hearing the appeal is the Sheriff Appeal Court, the reference in subsection (2) to a single judge of the court is a reference to an Appeal Sheriff. (3) Where, by virtue of this section, the court hearing the appeal suspends the disqualification of any person, it must send notice of the suspension to the Secretary of State. (4) The notice must be sent in such manner and to such address and must contain such particulars as the Secretary of State may determine.

Your change, as a redline

41 Power of appellate courts in Scotland to suspend disqualification.

(1) This section applies where a person has been convicted by or before a court in Scotland of an offence involving obligatory or discretionary disqualification and has been ordered to be disqualified; and in the following provisions of this section— (a) any reference to a person ordered to be disqualified is to be construed as a reference to a person so convicted and so ordered to be disqualified, and (b) any reference to his sentence includes a reference to the order of disqualification and to any other order made on his conviction and, accordingly, any reference to an appeal against his sentence includes a reference to an appeal against any order forming part of his sentence. (2) Where a person ordered to be disqualified appeals ..., whether on appeal against a summary conviction or a conviction on indictment or his sentence, the court hearing the appeal may, if it thinks fit, suspend the disqualification on such terms as it thinks fit. The powers conferred by this subsection on the court may be exercised by any single judge of the court. (2A) Where the court hearing the appeal is the Sheriff Appeal Court, the reference in subsection (2) to a single judge of the court is a reference to an Appeal Sheriff. (3) Where, by virtue of this section, the court hearing the appeal suspends the disqualification of any person, it must send notice of the suspension to the Secretary of State. (4) The notice must be sent in such manner and to such address and must contain such particulars as the Secretary of State may determine.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds