Propose a change

Sexual Offences Act 2003

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

99 Sections 97 and 98: relevant offences

(1) “Relevant offence” in sections 97 and 98 means an act which— (a) constituted an offence under the law in force in the country concerned, and (b) would have constituted an offence listed in Schedule 3 (other than at paragraph 60) if it had been done in any part of the United Kingdom. (2) An act punishable under the law in force in a country outside the United Kingdom constitutes an offence under that law for the purposes of subsection (1) however it is described in that law. (3) Subject to subsection (4), on an application for a notification order the condition in subsection (1)(b) is to be taken as met unless, not later than rules of court may provide, the person in respect of whom the order is sought serves on the applicant a notice— (a) stating that, on the facts as alleged with respect to the act concerned, the condition is not in his opinion met, (b) showing his grounds for that opinion, and (c) requiring the applicant to prove that the condition is met. (4) The court, if it thinks fit, may permit the person in respect of whom the order is sought to require the applicant to prove that the condition is met without service of a notice under subsection (3).

Your change, as a redline

99 Sections 97 and 98: relevant offences

(1) “Relevant offence” in sections 97 and 98 means an act which— (a) constituted an offence under the law in force in the country concerned, and (b) would have constituted an offence listed in Schedule 3 (other than at paragraph 60) if it had been done in any part of the United Kingdom. (2) An act punishable under the law in force in a country outside the United Kingdom constitutes an offence under that law for the purposes of subsection (1) however it is described in that law. (3) Subject to subsection (4), on an application for a notification order the condition in subsection (1)(b) is to be taken as met unless, not later than rules of court may provide, the person in respect of whom the order is sought serves on the applicant a notice— (a) stating that, on the facts as alleged with respect to the act concerned, the condition is not in his opinion met, (b) showing his grounds for that opinion, and (c) requiring the applicant to prove that the condition is met. (4) The court, if it thinks fit, may permit the person in respect of whom the order is sought to require the applicant to prove that the condition is met without service of a notice under subsection (3).

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds