Council Regulation (EEC) No 2761/92 of 21 September 1992 extending the validity of Regulation (EEC) No 4281/88 concerning the safeguard measure laid down in Article 2 of Decision No 5/88 of the EEC-Sweden Joint Committee amending Protocol 3
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
Avis juridique important | 31992R2761 Council Regulation (EEC) No 2761/92 of 21 September 1992 extending the validity of Regulation (EEC) No 4281/88 concerning the safeguard measure laid down in Article 2 of Decision No 5/88 of the EEC-Sweden Joint Committee amending Protocol 3 Official Journal L 280 , 24/09/1992 P. 0002 - 0002 COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) No 2761/92 of 21 September 1992 extending the validity of Regulation (EEC) No 4281/88 concerning the safeguard measure laid down in Article 2 of Decision No 5/88 of the EEC-Sweden Joint Committee amending Protocol 3 THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, and in particular Article 113 thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the Commission, Whereas an Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Kingdom of Sweden (1) was signed on 22 July 1972 and came into force on 1 January 1973; Whereas Protocol 3 concerning the definition of the concept of originating products and methods of administrative cooperation, which is an integral part of the said Agreement, was amended by Decision No 5/88 of the EEC-Sweden Joint Committee of 5 December 1988 (2) with a view to simplifying the cumulation rules; whereas a specific safeguard measure is provided for in Article 2 of that Decision; Whereas, on 21 December 1988, the Council adopted Regulation (EEC) No 4281/88 (3) for the purpose of laying down the procedures for implementing the said safeguard clause; Whereas Decision No 5/88 of the EEC-Sweden Joint Committee and Regulation (EEC) No 4281/88 were applicable until 31 December 1991; Whereas, on 27 July 1992, the EEC-Sweden Joint Committee adopted Decision No 2/92 (4) extending the validity of Decision No 5/88, also with respect to the Article 2 safeguard measure, for an indefinite period of time, with effect from 1 January 1992, whereas it is therefore necessary also to extend the validity of Regulation (EEC) No 4281/88, HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: Article 1 The validity of Regulation (EEC) No 4281/88 is hereby extended for an indefinite period of time. Article 2 This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities. It shall apply as from 1 January 1992. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States. Done at Brussels, 21 September 1992. For the Council The President J. GUMMER (1) OJ No L 300, 31. 12. 1972, p. 97. (2) OJ No L 381, 31. 12. 1988, p. 18. (3) OJ No L 381, 31. 12. 1988, p. 33. (4) See page 53 of this Official Journal.
Avis juridique important | 31992R2761 Council Regulation (EEC) No 2761/92 of 21 September 1992 extending the validity of Regulation (EEC) No 4281/88 concerning the safeguard measure laid down in Article 2 of Decision No 5/88 of the EEC-Sweden Joint Committee amending Protocol 3 Official Journal L 280 , 24/09/1992 P. 0002 - 0002 COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) No 2761/92 of 21 September 1992 extending the validity of Regulation (EEC) No 4281/88 concerning the safeguard measure laid down in Article 2 of Decision No 5/88 of the EEC-Sweden Joint Committee amending Protocol 3 THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, and in particular Article 113 thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the Commission, Whereas an Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Kingdom of Sweden (1) was signed on 22 July 1972 and came into force on 1 January 1973; Whereas Protocol 3 concerning the definition of the concept of originating products and methods of administrative cooperation, which is an integral part of the said Agreement, was amended by Decision No 5/88 of the EEC-Sweden Joint Committee of 5 December 1988 (2) with a view to simplifying the cumulation rules; whereas a specific safeguard measure is provided for in Article 2 of that Decision; Whereas, on 21 December 1988, the Council adopted Regulation (EEC) No 4281/88 (3) for the purpose of laying down the procedures for implementing the said safeguard clause; Whereas Decision No 5/88 of the EEC-Sweden Joint Committee and Regulation (EEC) No 4281/88 were applicable until 31 December 1991; Whereas, on 27 July 1992, the EEC-Sweden Joint Committee adopted Decision No 2/92 (4) extending the validity of Decision No 5/88, also with respect to the Article 2 safeguard measure, for an indefinite period of time, with effect from 1 January 1992, whereas it is therefore necessary also to extend the validity of Regulation (EEC) No 4281/88, HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: Article 1 The validity of Regulation (EEC) No 4281/88 is hereby extended for an indefinite period of time. Article 2 This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities. It shall apply as from 1 January 1992. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States. Done at Brussels, 21 September 1992. For the Council The President J. GUMMER (1) OJ No L 300, 31. 12. 1972, p. 97. (2) OJ No L 381, 31. 12. 1988, p. 18. (3) OJ No L 381, 31. 12. 1988, p. 33. (4) See page 53 of this Official Journal.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.