Insurance Act 2015
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
13A Implied term about payment of claims
(1) It is an implied term of every contract of insurance that if the insured makes a claim under the contract, the insurer must pay any sums due in respect of the claim within a reasonable time. (2) A reasonable time includes a reasonable time to investigate and assess the claim. (3) What is reasonable will depend on all the relevant circumstances, but the following are examples of things which may need to be taken into account— (a) the type of insurance, (b) the size and complexity of the claim, (c) compliance with any relevant statutory or regulatory rules or guidance, (d) factors outside the insurer's control. (4) If the insurer shows that there were reasonable grounds for disputing the claim (whether as to the amount of any sum payable, or as to whether anything at all is payable)— (a) the insurer does not breach the term implied by subsection (1) merely by failing to pay the claim (or the affected part of it) while the dispute is continuing, but (b) the conduct of the insurer in handling the claim may be a relevant factor in deciding whether that term was breached and, if so, when. (5) Remedies (for example, damages) available for breach of the term implied by subsection (1) are in addition to and distinct from— (a) any right to enforce payment of the sums due, and (b) any right to interest on those sums (whether under the contract, under another enactment, at the court's discretion or otherwise).
13A Implied term about payment of claims
(1) It is an implied term of every contract of insurance that if the insured makes a claim under the contract, the insurer must pay any sums due in respect of the claim within a reasonable time. (2) A reasonable time includes a reasonable time to investigate and assess the claim. (3) What is reasonable will depend on all the relevant circumstances, but the following are examples of things which may need to be taken into account— (a) the type of insurance, (b) the size and complexity of the claim, (c) compliance with any relevant statutory or regulatory rules or guidance, (d) factors outside the insurer's control. (4) If the insurer shows that there were reasonable grounds for disputing the claim (whether as to the amount of any sum payable, or as to whether anything at all is payable)— (a) the insurer does not breach the term implied by subsection (1) merely by failing to pay the claim (or the affected part of it) while the dispute is continuing, but (b) the conduct of the insurer in handling the claim may be a relevant factor in deciding whether that term was breached and, if so, when. (5) Remedies (for example, damages) available for breach of the term implied by subsection (1) are in addition to and distinct from— (a) any right to enforce payment of the sums due, and (b) any right to interest on those sums (whether under the contract, under another enactment, at the court's discretion or otherwise).
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.