Propose a change

Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

2 Fixing of High Court sittings.

(1) The High Court shall sit at such times and places as the Lord Justice General, whom failing the Lord Justice Clerk, may, after consultation with the Lord Advocate, determine. (2) Without prejudice to subsection (1) above, the High Court shall hold such additional sittings as the Lord Advocate may require. (3) Where an accused has been cited to , or otherwise required to attend, a diet to be held at any sitting of the High Court, the prosecutor may, at any time before the commencement of the diet or, in the case of a trial diet, the trial , apply to the Court to transfer the case to a diet to be held at a sitting of the Court in another place ; and a single judge of the High Court may— (a) after giving the accused or his counsel an opportunity to be heard; or (b) on the joint application of all parties, make an order for the transfer of the case. (3C) The judge may proceed under subsection (3) above on a joint application of the parties without hearing the parties and, accordingly, he may dispense with any hearing previously appointed for the purpose of considering the application. (4) Where no diets have been appointed to be held at a sitting of the High Court or if it is no longer expedient that a sitting should take place, it shall not be necessary for the sitting to take place. (5) If in any case a diet remains appointed to be held at a sitting which does not take place in pursuance of subsection (4) above, subsection (3) above shall apply in relation to the transfer of any other such case to another sitting. (6) For the purposes of subsection (3) above— (a) a diet shall be taken to commence when it is called; and (b) a trial shall be taken to commence when the oath is administered to the jury.

Your change, as a redline

2 Fixing of High Court sittings.

(1) The High Court shall sit at such times and places as the Lord Justice General, whom failing the Lord Justice Clerk, may, after consultation with the Lord Advocate, determine. (2) Without prejudice to subsection (1) above, the High Court shall hold such additional sittings as the Lord Advocate may require. (3) Where an accused has been cited to , or otherwise required to attend, a diet to be held at any sitting of the High Court, the prosecutor may, at any time before the commencement of the diet or, in the case of a trial diet, the trial , apply to the Court to transfer the case to a diet to be held at a sitting of the Court in another place ; and a single judge of the High Court may— (a) after giving the accused or his counsel an opportunity to be heard; or (b) on the joint application of all parties, make an order for the transfer of the case. (3C) The judge may proceed under subsection (3) above on a joint application of the parties without hearing the parties and, accordingly, he may dispense with any hearing previously appointed for the purpose of considering the application. (4) Where no diets have been appointed to be held at a sitting of the High Court or if it is no longer expedient that a sitting should take place, it shall not be necessary for the sitting to take place. (5) If in any case a diet remains appointed to be held at a sitting which does not take place in pursuance of subsection (4) above, subsection (3) above shall apply in relation to the transfer of any other such case to another sitting. (6) For the purposes of subsection (3) above— (a) a diet shall be taken to commence when it is called; and (b) a trial shall be taken to commence when the oath is administered to the jury.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds