Propose a change

Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

106A Appeal against automatic sentences where earlier conviction quashed.

(1) This subsection applies where— (a) a person has been sentenced under section 205A(2) of this Act; (b) he had, at the time at which the offence for which he was so sentenced was committed, only one previous conviction for a qualifying offence or a relevant offence within the meaning of that section; and (c) after he has been so sentenced, the conviction mentioned in paragraph (b) above has been quashed. (2) This subsection applies where— (a) a person has been sentenced under section 205B(2) of this Act; (b) he had, at the time at which the offence for which he was so sentenced was committed, only two previous convictions for class A drug trafficking offences within the meaning of that section; and (c) after he has been so sentenced, one of the convictions mentioned in paragraph (b) above has been quashed. (3) Where subsection (1) or (2) above applies, the person may appeal under section 106(1)(b) of this Act against the sentence imposed on him under section 205A(2) or, as the case may be, 205B(2) of this Act. (4) An appeal under section 106(1)(b) of this Act by virtue of subsection (3) above— (a) may be made notwithstanding that the person has previously appealed under that section; and (b) shall be lodged within two weeks of the quashing of the conviction as mentioned in subsection (1)(c) or, as the case may be, (2)(c) above. (5) Where an appeal is made under section 106(1)(b) by virtue of this section, the following provisions of this Act shall not apply in relation to such an appeal, namely— (a) section 121; and (b) section 126.

Your change, as a redline

106A Appeal against automatic sentences where earlier conviction quashed.

(1) This subsection applies where— (a) a person has been sentenced under section 205A(2) of this Act; (b) he had, at the time at which the offence for which he was so sentenced was committed, only one previous conviction for a qualifying offence or a relevant offence within the meaning of that section; and (c) after he has been so sentenced, the conviction mentioned in paragraph (b) above has been quashed. (2) This subsection applies where— (a) a person has been sentenced under section 205B(2) of this Act; (b) he had, at the time at which the offence for which he was so sentenced was committed, only two previous convictions for class A drug trafficking offences within the meaning of that section; and (c) after he has been so sentenced, one of the convictions mentioned in paragraph (b) above has been quashed. (3) Where subsection (1) or (2) above applies, the person may appeal under section 106(1)(b) of this Act against the sentence imposed on him under section 205A(2) or, as the case may be, 205B(2) of this Act. (4) An appeal under section 106(1)(b) of this Act by virtue of subsection (3) above— (a) may be made notwithstanding that the person has previously appealed under that section; and (b) shall be lodged within two weeks of the quashing of the conviction as mentioned in subsection (1)(c) or, as the case may be, (2)(c) above. (5) Where an appeal is made under section 106(1)(b) by virtue of this section, the following provisions of this Act shall not apply in relation to such an appeal, namely— (a) section 121; and (b) section 126.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds