Propose a change

Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

227X Periodic review of community payback orders

(1) On imposing a community payback order on an offender, the court may include in the order provision for the order to be reviewed at such time or times as may be specified in the order. (2) A review carried out in pursuance of such provision is referred to in this section as a “ progress review ”. (3) A progress review may be carried out by the court which imposed the community payback order or (if different) the appropriate court, and, where those courts are different, the court must specify in the order which of those courts is to carry out the reviews. (4) A progress review is to be carried out in such manner as the court carrying out the review may determine. (5) Before each progress review, the responsible officer must give the court a written report on the offender's compliance with the requirements imposed by the community payback order in the period to which the review relates. (6) The offender must attend each progress review. (7) If the offender fails to attend a progress review, the court may— (a) issue a citation requiring the offender's attendance, or (b) issue a warrant for the offender's arrest. (8) The unified citation provisions apply in relation to a citation under subsection (7)(a) as they apply in relation to a citation under section 216(3)(a) of this Act. (9) Subsections (10) and (11) apply where, in the course of carrying out a progress review in respect of a community payback order, it appears to the court that the offender has failed to comply with a requirement imposed by the order. (10) The court must— (a) provide the offender with written details of the alleged failure, (b) inform the offender that the offender is entitled to be legally represented, and (c) inform the offender that no answer need be given to the allegation before the offender— (i) has been given an opportunity to take legal advice, or (ii) has indicated that the offender does not wish to take legal advice. (11) The court must then— (a) if it is the appropriate court, appoint another hearing for consideration of the alleged failure in accordance with section 227ZC, or (b) if it is not the appropriate court, refer the alleged failure to that court for consideration in accordance with that section. (12) On conclusion of a progress review in respect of a community payback order, the court may vary, revoke or discharge the order in accordance with section 227Z.

Your change, as a redline

227X Periodic review of community payback orders

(1) On imposing a community payback order on an offender, the court may include in the order provision for the order to be reviewed at such time or times as may be specified in the order. (2) A review carried out in pursuance of such provision is referred to in this section as a “ progress review ”. (3) A progress review may be carried out by the court which imposed the community payback order or (if different) the appropriate court, and, where those courts are different, the court must specify in the order which of those courts is to carry out the reviews. (4) A progress review is to be carried out in such manner as the court carrying out the review may determine. (5) Before each progress review, the responsible officer must give the court a written report on the offender's compliance with the requirements imposed by the community payback order in the period to which the review relates. (6) The offender must attend each progress review. (7) If the offender fails to attend a progress review, the court may— (a) issue a citation requiring the offender's attendance, or (b) issue a warrant for the offender's arrest. (8) The unified citation provisions apply in relation to a citation under subsection (7)(a) as they apply in relation to a citation under section 216(3)(a) of this Act. (9) Subsections (10) and (11) apply where, in the course of carrying out a progress review in respect of a community payback order, it appears to the court that the offender has failed to comply with a requirement imposed by the order. (10) The court must— (a) provide the offender with written details of the alleged failure, (b) inform the offender that the offender is entitled to be legally represented, and (c) inform the offender that no answer need be given to the allegation before the offender— (i) has been given an opportunity to take legal advice, or (ii) has indicated that the offender does not wish to take legal advice. (11) The court must then— (a) if it is the appropriate court, appoint another hearing for consideration of the alleged failure in accordance with section 227ZC, or (b) if it is not the appropriate court, refer the alleged failure to that court for consideration in accordance with that section. (12) On conclusion of a progress review in respect of a community payback order, the court may vary, revoke or discharge the order in accordance with section 227Z.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds