Propose a change

Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

271BZC Child witnesses in certain solemn cases: modifications of section 271D

(1) In a case to which section 271BZA applies, section 271D applies with the following modifications. (2) Section 271D has effect as if— (a) subsections (3A) to (3C) were omitted, (b) subsection (4A) were omitted, and (c) the following subsections were inserted after subsection (4A)— (4B) Subsections (2) to (4) are subject to subsections (4C) to (4H). (4C) Unless the hearing has already commenced when the court commences its review or the court is satisfied that an exception is justified under section 271BZA(7) or (8), an order made by the court under this section must not— (a) revoke the earlier order, or (b) vary it in such a way that it no longer satisfies the requirements set out in section 271BZA(4)(a)(i), (ii) and (iii). (4D) An order made by the court under this section must have the effect of authorising the use of the special measure of taking of evidence by a commissioner in accordance with section 271I if— (a) that is requested by any party to the proceedings, and (b) the earlier order authorises only the special measure of giving evidence in chief in the form of a prior statement in accordance with section 271M. (4E) However, an order made by the court under this section need not have the effect described in subsection (4D) if— (a) the hearing has already commenced when the court commences its review, or (b) the court is satisfied that an exception is justified under section 271BZA(7) or (8). (4F) Even if the hearing has already commenced when the court commences its review or the court is satisfied that an exception is justified under section 271BZA(7) or (8), an order made under this section must not have the effect of requiring the child witness to be present in the courtroom to give evidence unless the court is satisfied that subsection (4G) or (4H) applies. (4G) This subsection applies if— (a) the giving of evidence by the child witness in some way other than by being present in the courtroom for that purpose would give rise to a significant risk of prejudice to the fairness of the hearing or otherwise to the interests of justice, and (b) that risk significantly outweighs any risk of prejudice to the interests of the child witness if the child witness were to be present in the courtroom to give evidence. (4H) This subsection applies if— (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) the child witness expresses a wish to be present in the courtroom to give evidence, and (c) it would be in the child witness's best interests to be present in the courtroom to give evidence.

Your change, as a redline

271BZC Child witnesses in certain solemn cases: modifications of section 271D

(1) In a case to which section 271BZA applies, section 271D applies with the following modifications. (2) Section 271D has effect as if— (a) subsections (3A) to (3C) were omitted, (b) subsection (4A) were omitted, and (c) the following subsections were inserted after subsection (4A)— (4B) Subsections (2) to (4) are subject to subsections (4C) to (4H). (4C) Unless the hearing has already commenced when the court commences its review or the court is satisfied that an exception is justified under section 271BZA(7) or (8), an order made by the court under this section must not— (a) revoke the earlier order, or (b) vary it in such a way that it no longer satisfies the requirements set out in section 271BZA(4)(a)(i), (ii) and (iii). (4D) An order made by the court under this section must have the effect of authorising the use of the special measure of taking of evidence by a commissioner in accordance with section 271I if— (a) that is requested by any party to the proceedings, and (b) the earlier order authorises only the special measure of giving evidence in chief in the form of a prior statement in accordance with section 271M. (4E) However, an order made by the court under this section need not have the effect described in subsection (4D) if— (a) the hearing has already commenced when the court commences its review, or (b) the court is satisfied that an exception is justified under section 271BZA(7) or (8). (4F) Even if the hearing has already commenced when the court commences its review or the court is satisfied that an exception is justified under section 271BZA(7) or (8), an order made under this section must not have the effect of requiring the child witness to be present in the courtroom to give evidence unless the court is satisfied that subsection (4G) or (4H) applies. (4G) This subsection applies if— (a) the giving of evidence by the child witness in some way other than by being present in the courtroom for that purpose would give rise to a significant risk of prejudice to the fairness of the hearing or otherwise to the interests of justice, and (b) that risk significantly outweighs any risk of prejudice to the interests of the child witness if the child witness were to be present in the courtroom to give evidence. (4H) This subsection applies if— (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) the child witness expresses a wish to be present in the courtroom to give evidence, and (c) it would be in the child witness's best interests to be present in the courtroom to give evidence.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds