Propose a change

Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

271M Giving evidence in chief in the form of a prior statement

(1) This section applies where the special measure to be used in respect of a vulnerable witness is giving evidence in chief in the form of a prior statement. (2) A statement made by the vulnerable witness which is lodged in evidence for the purposes of this section by or on behalf of the party citing the vulnerable witness shall, subject to subsection (3) below, be admissible as the witness’s evidence in chief, or as part of the witness’s evidence in chief, without the witness being required to adopt or otherwise speak to the statement in giving evidence in court. (3) Section 260 of this Act shall apply to a statement lodged for the purposes of this section as it applies to a prior statement referred to in that section but as if— (a) references to a prior statement were references to the statement lodged for the purposes of this section, (b) in subsection (1), the words “where a witness gives evidence in criminal proceedings” were omitted, and (c) in subsection (2), paragraph (b) were omitted. (4) This section does not affect the admissibility of any statement made by any person which is admissible otherwise than by virtue of this section. (5) In this section, “statement” has the meaning given in section 262(1) of this Act.

Your change, as a redline

271M Giving evidence in chief in the form of a prior statement

(1) This section applies where the special measure to be used in respect of a vulnerable witness is giving evidence in chief in the form of a prior statement. (2) A statement made by the vulnerable witness which is lodged in evidence for the purposes of this section by or on behalf of the party citing the vulnerable witness shall, subject to subsection (3) below, be admissible as the witness’s evidence in chief, or as part of the witness’s evidence in chief, without the witness being required to adopt or otherwise speak to the statement in giving evidence in court. (3) Section 260 of this Act shall apply to a statement lodged for the purposes of this section as it applies to a prior statement referred to in that section but as if— (a) references to a prior statement were references to the statement lodged for the purposes of this section, (b) in subsection (1), the words “where a witness gives evidence in criminal proceedings” were omitted, and (c) in subsection (2), paragraph (b) were omitted. (4) This section does not affect the admissibility of any statement made by any person which is admissible otherwise than by virtue of this section. (5) In this section, “statement” has the meaning given in section 262(1) of this Act.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds