Propose a change

Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

286A Proof of previous conviction by court in other member State

(1) A previous conviction by a court in a member State of the European Union may be proved against any person in any criminal proceedings by the production of evidence of the conviction and by showing that his fingerprints and those of the person convicted are the fingerprints of the same person. (2) A certificate— (a) bearing— (i) to have been sealed with the official seal of a Minister of the State in question; and (ii) to contain particulars relating to a conviction extracted from the criminal records of that State; and (b) including copies of fingerprints and certifying that those copies— (i) are of fingerprints appearing from those records to have been taken from the person convicted on the occasion of the conviction, or on the occasion of his last conviction; and (ii) would be admissible in evidence in criminal proceedings in that State as a record of the skin of that person’s fingers, shall be sufficient evidence of the conviction or, as the case may be, of the person’s last conviction and of all preceding convictions and that the copies of the fingerprints included in the certificate are copies of the fingerprints of the person convicted. (3) A conviction bearing to have been— (a) extracted from the criminal records of the State in question; and (b) issued by an officer of that State whose duties include the issuing of such extracts, shall be received in evidence without being sworn to by witnesses. (4) Subsection (9) of section 285 of this Act applies in relation to this section as it does in relation to that section.

Your change, as a redline

286A Proof of previous conviction by court in other member State

(1) A previous conviction by a court in a member State of the European Union may be proved against any person in any criminal proceedings by the production of evidence of the conviction and by showing that his fingerprints and those of the person convicted are the fingerprints of the same person. (2) A certificate— (a) bearing— (i) to have been sealed with the official seal of a Minister of the State in question; and (ii) to contain particulars relating to a conviction extracted from the criminal records of that State; and (b) including copies of fingerprints and certifying that those copies— (i) are of fingerprints appearing from those records to have been taken from the person convicted on the occasion of the conviction, or on the occasion of his last conviction; and (ii) would be admissible in evidence in criminal proceedings in that State as a record of the skin of that person’s fingers, shall be sufficient evidence of the conviction or, as the case may be, of the person’s last conviction and of all preceding convictions and that the copies of the fingerprints included in the certificate are copies of the fingerprints of the person convicted. (3) A conviction bearing to have been— (a) extracted from the criminal records of the State in question; and (b) issued by an officer of that State whose duties include the issuing of such extracts, shall be received in evidence without being sworn to by witnesses. (4) Subsection (9) of section 285 of this Act applies in relation to this section as it does in relation to that section.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds