Propose a change

Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

288AC Appeals to the Supreme Court: UNCRC compatibility issues

(1) For the purpose of determining any UNCRC compatibility issue an appeal lies to the Supreme Court against a determination in criminal proceedings by a court of 2 or more judges of the High Court. (2) On an appeal under this section— (a) the powers of the Supreme Court are exercisable only for the purpose of determining the UNCRC compatibility issue, (b) for that purpose the Court may make any change in the formulation of that issue that it thinks necessary in the interests of justice. (3) When it has determined the UNCRC compatibility issue, the Supreme Court must remit the proceedings to the High Court. (4) An appeal under this section against a determination lies only— (a) with the permission of the High Court, or (b) if the High Court has refused permission, with the permission of the Supreme Court. (5) Subsection (4) does not apply if it is an appeal by the Lord Advocate against a determination by the High Court of a UNCRC compatibility issue referred to it under section 288AB(4). (6) An application to the High Court for permission under subsection (4)(a) must be made— (a) within 28 days of the date of the determination against which the appeal lies, or (b) within such longer period as the High Court considers equitable having regard to all the circumstances. (7) An application to the Supreme Court for permission under subsection (4)(b) must be made— (a) within 28 days of the date on which the High Court refused permission under subsection (4)(b), or (b) within such longer period as the Supreme Court considers equitable having regard to all the circumstances.

Your change, as a redline

288AC Appeals to the Supreme Court: UNCRC compatibility issues

(1) For the purpose of determining any UNCRC compatibility issue an appeal lies to the Supreme Court against a determination in criminal proceedings by a court of 2 or more judges of the High Court. (2) On an appeal under this section— (a) the powers of the Supreme Court are exercisable only for the purpose of determining the UNCRC compatibility issue, (b) for that purpose the Court may make any change in the formulation of that issue that it thinks necessary in the interests of justice. (3) When it has determined the UNCRC compatibility issue, the Supreme Court must remit the proceedings to the High Court. (4) An appeal under this section against a determination lies only— (a) with the permission of the High Court, or (b) if the High Court has refused permission, with the permission of the Supreme Court. (5) Subsection (4) does not apply if it is an appeal by the Lord Advocate against a determination by the High Court of a UNCRC compatibility issue referred to it under section 288AB(4). (6) An application to the High Court for permission under subsection (4)(a) must be made— (a) within 28 days of the date of the determination against which the appeal lies, or (b) within such longer period as the High Court considers equitable having regard to all the circumstances. (7) An application to the Supreme Court for permission under subsection (4)(b) must be made— (a) within 28 days of the date on which the High Court refused permission under subsection (4)(b), or (b) within such longer period as the Supreme Court considers equitable having regard to all the circumstances.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds