Propose a change

Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

288DA Jury direction relating to lack of communication about offence

(1) Subsection (2) applies where, in a trial on indictment for a sexual offence— (a) evidence is given which suggests that the person against whom the offence is alleged to have been committed— (i) did not tell, or delayed in telling, anyone, or a particular person, about the offence, or (ii) did not report, or delayed in reporting, the offence to any investigating agency, or a particular investigating agency, or (b) a question is asked, or a statement is made, with a view to eliciting, or drawing attention to, evidence of that nature. (2) In charging the jury, the judge must advise that— (a) there can be good reasons why a person against whom a sexual offence is committed may not tell others about it or report it to an investigating agency, or may delay in doing either of those things, and (b) this does not, therefore, necessarily indicate that an allegation is false. (3) Subsection (2) does not apply if the judge considers that, in the circumstances of the case, no reasonable jury could consider the evidence, question or statement by reason of which subsection (2) would otherwise apply to be material to the question of whether the alleged offence is proved. (4) For the purposes of this section— “investigating agency” means— a police force maintained for the area where the offence is alleged to have been committed, any other person who has functions (to any extent) of investigating crime in the area where the offence is alleged to have been committed, “sexual offence” has the same meaning as in section 210A, except that it does not include— an offence under section 170 of the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979, or an offence under section 52A of the Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982.

Your change, as a redline

288DA Jury direction relating to lack of communication about offence

(1) Subsection (2) applies where, in a trial on indictment for a sexual offence— (a) evidence is given which suggests that the person against whom the offence is alleged to have been committed— (i) did not tell, or delayed in telling, anyone, or a particular person, about the offence, or (ii) did not report, or delayed in reporting, the offence to any investigating agency, or a particular investigating agency, or (b) a question is asked, or a statement is made, with a view to eliciting, or drawing attention to, evidence of that nature. (2) In charging the jury, the judge must advise that— (a) there can be good reasons why a person against whom a sexual offence is committed may not tell others about it or report it to an investigating agency, or may delay in doing either of those things, and (b) this does not, therefore, necessarily indicate that an allegation is false. (3) Subsection (2) does not apply if the judge considers that, in the circumstances of the case, no reasonable jury could consider the evidence, question or statement by reason of which subsection (2) would otherwise apply to be material to the question of whether the alleged offence is proved. (4) For the purposes of this section— “investigating agency” means— a police force maintained for the area where the offence is alleged to have been committed, any other person who has functions (to any extent) of investigating crime in the area where the offence is alleged to have been committed, “sexual offence” has the same meaning as in section 210A, except that it does not include— an offence under section 170 of the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979, or an offence under section 52A of the Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds