Propose a change

Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

288DB Jury direction relating to absence of physical resistance or physical force

(1) Subsection (2) applies where, in a trial on indictment for a sexual offence— (a) evidence is given which suggests that the sexual activity took place without physical resistance on the part of the person against whom the offence is alleged to have been committed, or (b) a question is asked, or a statement is made, with a view to eliciting, or drawing attention to, evidence of that nature. (2) In charging the jury, the judge must advise that— (a) there can be good reasons why a person against whom a sexual offence is committed might not physically resist the sexual activity, and (b) an absence of physical resistance does not, therefore, necessarily indicate that an allegation is false. (3) Subsection (2) does not apply if the judge considers that, in the circumstances of the case, no reasonable jury could consider the evidence, question or statement by reason of which subsection (2) would otherwise apply to be material to the question of whether the alleged offence is proved. (4) Subsection (5) applies where, in a trial on indictment for a sexual offence— (a) evidence is given which suggests that the sexual activity took place without the accused using physical force to overcome the will of the person against whom the offence is alleged to have been committed, or (b) a question is asked, or a statement is made, with a view to eliciting, or drawing attention to, evidence of that nature. (5) In charging the jury, the judge must advise that— (a) there can be good reasons why a person may, in committing a sexual offence, not need to use physical force to overcome the will of the person against whom the offence is committed, and (b) an absence of physical force does not, therefore, necessarily indicate that an allegation is false. (6) Subsection (5) does not apply if the judge considers that, in the circumstances of the case, no reasonable jury could consider the evidence, question or statement by reason of which subsection (5) would otherwise apply to be material to the question of whether the alleged offence is proved. (7) For the purposes of this section— “sexual activity” means the sexual activity which is the subject of the alleged sexual offence, “sexual offence” means— rape (whether at common law or under section 1(1) of the Sexual Offences (Scotland) Act 2009), indecent assault, sodomy, clandestine injury to women, an offence under section 2 of the Sexual Offences (Scotland) Act 2009 (sexual assault by penetration), an offence under section 3 of that Act (sexual assault), an offence under section 4 of that Act (sexual coercion).

Your change, as a redline

288DB Jury direction relating to absence of physical resistance or physical force

(1) Subsection (2) applies where, in a trial on indictment for a sexual offence— (a) evidence is given which suggests that the sexual activity took place without physical resistance on the part of the person against whom the offence is alleged to have been committed, or (b) a question is asked, or a statement is made, with a view to eliciting, or drawing attention to, evidence of that nature. (2) In charging the jury, the judge must advise that— (a) there can be good reasons why a person against whom a sexual offence is committed might not physically resist the sexual activity, and (b) an absence of physical resistance does not, therefore, necessarily indicate that an allegation is false. (3) Subsection (2) does not apply if the judge considers that, in the circumstances of the case, no reasonable jury could consider the evidence, question or statement by reason of which subsection (2) would otherwise apply to be material to the question of whether the alleged offence is proved. (4) Subsection (5) applies where, in a trial on indictment for a sexual offence— (a) evidence is given which suggests that the sexual activity took place without the accused using physical force to overcome the will of the person against whom the offence is alleged to have been committed, or (b) a question is asked, or a statement is made, with a view to eliciting, or drawing attention to, evidence of that nature. (5) In charging the jury, the judge must advise that— (a) there can be good reasons why a person may, in committing a sexual offence, not need to use physical force to overcome the will of the person against whom the offence is committed, and (b) an absence of physical force does not, therefore, necessarily indicate that an allegation is false. (6) Subsection (5) does not apply if the judge considers that, in the circumstances of the case, no reasonable jury could consider the evidence, question or statement by reason of which subsection (5) would otherwise apply to be material to the question of whether the alleged offence is proved. (7) For the purposes of this section— “sexual activity” means the sexual activity which is the subject of the alleged sexual offence, “sexual offence” means— rape (whether at common law or under section 1(1) of the Sexual Offences (Scotland) Act 2009), indecent assault, sodomy, clandestine injury to women, an offence under section 2 of the Sexual Offences (Scotland) Act 2009 (sexual assault by penetration), an offence under section 3 of that Act (sexual assault), an offence under section 4 of that Act (sexual coercion).

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds